Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23583489›Full record

ArticleJournal of virological methods2013

Comparison of four multiplex PCR assays for the detection of viral pathogens in respiratory specimens.

Trevor P Anderson, Anja M Werno, Kevin Barratt, Patalee Mahagamasekera, David R Murdoch, Lance C Jennings

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virological methods, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2: A Diagnostic Challenge.Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation · 2021
    Article
  7. [Human coronaviruses].Revue francophone des laboratoires : RFL · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical evaluation of AusDiagnostics SARS-CoV-2 multiplex tandem PCR assay.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of Anyplex™ II RV16 and RB5 real-time RT-PCR compared to SeeplexJournal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy · 2017
    Article
  18. Role of multiplex PCR analysis in children with febrile seizures.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Recent sequence variation in probe binding site affected detection of respiratory syncytial virus group B by real-time RT-PCR.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Trevor P AndersonMicrobiology Unit, Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Anja M Werno
Kevin Barratt
Patalee Mahagamasekera
David R Murdoch
Lance C Jennings

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiplex PCR has become the test of choice for the detection of multiple respiratory viruses in clinical specimens. However, there are few direct comparisons of different PCR assays. This study compares 4 different multiplex PCR assays for the recovery of common respiratory viruses. We tested 213 respiratory specimens using four different multiplex PCR assays: the xTAG respiratory viral panel fast (Abbott Molecular Laboratories), Fast-track Respiratory Pathogen assay (Fast-track Diagnostics), Easyplex respiratory pathogen 12 kit (Ausdiagnostics), and an in-house multiplex real-time PCR assay. The performance of the four assays was very similar, with 93-100% agreement for all comparisons. Other issues, such as through-put, technical requirements and cost, are likely to be as important for making a decision about which of these assays to use given their comparative performance.

Indexed as

HumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionRespiratory Tract InfectionsVirologyVirus DiseasesViruses

Identifiers

PMID23583489
PMCPMC7119551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.