ArticleNeuroImage2013
Sample size and the fallacies of classical inference.
Article in NeuroImage, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Statistical agnostic regression: A machine learning method to validate regression models.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Angry facial expressions elicit a late attentional withdrawal.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Long-term mindfulness meditation increases occurrence of sensory and attention brain states.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Virtual-Reality Performance-Based Assessment of Cognitive Functions in Adult Patients With Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.Neuropsychology review · 2022Article
- Testing the Magnitude of Correlations Across Experimental Conditions.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Providing Evidence for the Null Hypothesis in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Group-Level Bayesian Inference.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2021Article
- Modality-specific dysfunctional neural processing of social-abstract and non-social-concrete information in schizophrenia.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2021Article
- Ten simple rules for predictive modeling of individual differences in neuroimaging.NeuroImage · 2019Review
- Development of frontoparietal connectivity predicts longitudinal symptom changes in young people with autism spectrum disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2019Article
- Sparse Sampling of Silence Type I Errors With an Emphasis on Primary Auditory Cortex.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Motor Abilities in Adolescents Born Preterm Are Associated With Microstructure of the Corpus Callosum.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
- The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences.Behavior research methods · 2018Article
- Searching for behavior relating to grey matter volume in a-priori defined right dorsal premotor regions: Lessons learned.NeuroImage · 2017Article
- Stimulus-Driven Reorienting Impairs Executive Control of Attention: Evidence for a Common Bottleneck in Anterior Insula.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2016Article
- A "one size fits all" approach to language fMRI: increasing specificity and applicability by adding a self-paced component.Experimental brain research · 2016Article
- Functional Connectivity Is Altered in Concussed Adolescent Athletes Despite Medical Clearance to Return to Play: A Preliminary Report.Frontiers in neurology · 2016Article
- Cross-validation and hypothesis testing in neuroimaging: An irenic comment on the exchange between Friston and Lindquist et al.NeuroImage · 2015Article
- Attempted and successful compensation in preclinical and early manifest neurodegeneration - a review of task FMRI studies.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2014Review
- Article
- Confidence and precision increase with high statistical power.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
I would like to thank Michael Ingre, Martin Lindquist and their co-authors for their thoughtful responses to my ironic Comments and Controversies piece. I was of two minds about whether to accept the invitation to reply - largely because I was convinced by most of their observations. I concluded that I should say this explicitly, taking the opportunity to consolidate points of consensus and highlight outstanding issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23583356What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.