Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23580868›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse and rehabilitation2012

The Treatment Effectiveness Assessment (TEA): an efficient, patient-centered instrument for evaluating progress in recovery from addiction.

Walter Ling, David Farabee, Dagmar Liepa, Li-Tzy Wu

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse and rehabilitation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05262270 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Extended-Release Naltrexone and Monthly Extended-Release Buprenorphine for Cocaine Use Disorder (CURB-2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterRan2023 to 2025Enrolled427ConditionsCocaine Use DisorderArmsExtended-Release Naltrexone, Extended Release Buprenorphine, Placebo (PLB) Injectable matched to XR-NTX, Placebo (PLB) Injectable matched to XR-BUP
NCT06073340 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Observational Longitudinal Study of Individuals With Stimulant Use Disorder: Research and Development of a Biosignature

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterRan2023 to 2025Enrolled72ConditionsStimulant Use, Stimulant-Related Disorder, Healthy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Bupropion and Naltrexone in Methamphetamine Use Disorder.The New England journal of medicine · 2021
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Walter LingIntegrated Substance Abuse Programs, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
David Farabee
Dagmar Liepa
Li-Tzy Wu

Funding

The National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials NetworkU10DA013045 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LING, WALTER NMN · 1999 to 2015
$52.6M
MDMA and Other Hallucinogen Use: Onset and Abuse/DependenceR01DA019623 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WU, LI-TZY · 2007 to 2013
$1.1M
Classification of Substance Use Severity and Treatment Outcomes: NIDA CTN StudiesR33DA027503 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WU, LI-TZY · 2010 to 2012
$1.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019623NIDA NIH HHS R33 DA027503NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fields of addiction medicine and addiction research have long sought an efficient yet comprehensive instrument to assess patient progress in treatment and recovery. Traditional tools are expensive, time consuming, complex, and based on topics that clinicians or researchers think are important. Thus, they typically do not provide patient-centered information that is meaningful and relevant to the lives of patients with substance use disorders. To improve our ability to understand patients' progress in treatment from their perspectives, the authors and colleagues developed a patient-oriented assessment instrument that has considerable advantages over existing instruments: brevity, simplicity, ease of administration, orientation to the patient, and cost (none). The resulting Treatment Effectiveness Assessment (TEA) elicits patient responses that help the patient and the clinician quickly gauge patient progress in treatment and in recovery, according to the patients' sense of what is important within four domains established by prior research. Patients provide both numerical responses and representative details on their substance use, health, lifestyle, and community. No software is required for data entry or scoring, and no formal training is required to administer the TEA. This article describes the development of the TEA and the initial phases of its application in clinical practice and in research.

Indexed as

brief instrumentglobal treatment progresspatient-centeredsubstance use disorders

Identifiers

PMID23580868
PMCPMC3621788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.