Trial reportClinical medicine & research2013
Predictors of willingness to participate in window-of-opportunity breast trials.
Trial report in Clinical medicine & research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the feasibility of performing window of opportunity trials in breast cancer.International journal of surgical oncology · 2015Trial
- Article
- Patient perspectives on window of opportunity clinical trials in early-stage breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- Window-of-Opportunity Study of Valproic Acid in Breast Cancer Testing a Gene Expression Biomarker.JCO precision oncology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe conducted a pilot survey to evaluate breast cancer patients' willingness to participate in a preoperative chemoprevention (ie, window-of-opportunity) study. Design A 27-question written survey was developed and administered to participants. Setting A breast cancer specialty clinic at the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics. Participants 30 adult patients with newly diagnosed operable breast cancer participated after signing informed consent.
methodsA convenience sample of 30 participants was recruited from July 2005 through January 2006. Participants were administered the survey in clinic. Univariate ordinal logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of willingness to participate in window-of-opportunity trials.
resultsOverall, 26.7% of respondents were willing to participate in a research trial between the time of breast cancer diagnosis and surgery. Univariate ordinal logistic regression models identified that women with a prior history of breast cancer (P=0.060), prior research participation (P=0.006), more education (P=0.034), and self-reported breast cancer knowledge (P=0.043) were more willing to participate. On average, women preferred to have surgery 7 days (range 1-14) after their diagnosis, but the actual average wait time between diagnostic biopsy and surgery was 37.5 days (standard deviation = 23.4 days).
conclusionThere is ample time before breast surgery to conduct preoperative window-of-opportunity trials. Interventions aimed at expanding patients' breast cancer knowledge may improve accrual to window-of-opportunity studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.