Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23580539›Full record

ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2013

High-resolution mapping of in vivo genomic transcription factor binding sites using in situ DNase I footprinting and ChIP-seq.

Onuma Chumsakul, Kensuke Nakamura, Tetsuya Kurata, Tomoaki Sakamoto, Jon L Hobman, Naotake Ogasawara, Taku Oshima, Shu Ishikawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome microbiology at 20 years: who we are and where we are going.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Differential expression of theApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. MOB rules: Antibiotic Exposure Reprograms Metabolism to MobilizebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Two Distinct Regulatory Systems Control Pulcherrimin Biosynthesis inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. GeF-seq: A Simple Procedure for Base-Pair Resolution ChIP-seq.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  8. IHF and Fis asInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Onuma ChumsakulGraduate School of Biological Sciences, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5, Takayama, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan.
Kensuke Nakamura
Tetsuya Kurata
Tomoaki Sakamoto
Jon L Hobman
Naotake Ogasawara
Taku Oshima
Shu Ishikawa

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H531586/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate identification of the DNA-binding sites of transcription factors and other DNA-binding proteins on the genome is crucial to understanding their molecular interactions with DNA. Here, we describe a new method: Genome Footprinting by high-throughput sequencing (GeF-seq), which combines in vivo DNase I digestion of genomic DNA with ChIP coupled with high-throughput sequencing. We have determined the in vivo binding sites of a Bacillus subtilis global regulator, AbrB, using GeF-seq. This method shows that exact DNA-binding sequences, which were protected from in vivo DNase I digestion, were resolved at a comparable resolution to that achieved by in vitro DNase I footprinting, and this was simply attained without the necessity of prediction by peak-calling programs. Moreover, DNase I digestion of the bacterial nucleoid resolved the closely positioned AbrB-binding sites, which had previously appeared as one peak in ChAP-chip and ChAP-seq experiments. The high-resolution determination of AbrB-binding sites using GeF-seq enabled us to identify bipartite TGGNA motifs in 96% of the AbrB-binding sites. Interestingly, in a thousand binding sites with very low-binding intensities, single TGGNA motifs were also identified. Thus, GeF-seq is a powerful method to elucidate the molecular mechanism of target protein binding to its cognate DNA sequences.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsBinding SitesChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDeoxyribonuclease IDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA FootprintingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMolecular Sequence DataNucleotide MotifsProtein BindingSequence Analysis, DNATranscription FactorsAbrB protein, Bacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsDeoxyribonuclease IDNA-Binding ProteinsTranscription FactorsAbrBBacillus subtilisChIP-seqGeF-seq

Identifiers

PMID23580539
PMCPMC3738160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.