ArticleIntensive care medicine2013
Adapted ECMO criteria for newborns with persistent pulmonary hypertension after inhaled nitric oxide and/or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- International treatment outcomes of neonates on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN): a systematic review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Therapeutic effects and outcomes of rescue high-frequency oscillatory ventilation for premature infants with severe refractory respiratory failure.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Inhaled pulmonary vasodilators: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Review
- Hydrocortisone Improves Oxygenation Index and Systolic Blood Pressure in Term Infants With Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension.Clinical medicine insights. Pediatrics · 2019Article
- Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2013: III. Sepsis, infections, respiratory diseases, pediatrics.Intensive care medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEarly prediction of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) requirement in term newborns with persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN), partially responding to inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) and/or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), based on oxygenation parameters.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study in 53 partial responders from among 133 term newborns with PPHN born between 2002 and 2007. Alveolar-to-arterial oxygen gradient (AaDO₂) values were determined in these 53 partial responders during the initial 72 h of iNO and/or HFOV treatment and compared between newborns who ultimately did (n = 11) and did not (n = 42) need ECMO.
resultsOver 72 h, partial responders not requiring ECMO showed a more profound AaDO₂ decrease than those who needed ECMO (median decline 242.5 mmHg, IQR 144 to 353 mmHg, vs. 35 mmHg, IQR -15 to 123 mmHg; p = 0.0007). A decline of <123 mmHg over 72 h predicted the need for ECMO (sensitivity 82 %, specificity 79 %). At 72 h, AaDO₂ was significantly lower in partial responders without the need for ECMO than in those who did need ECMO (median 369 mmHg, IQR 258 to 478 mmHg, vs. 570 mmHg IQR 455 to 590 mmHg; p = 0.0008). An AaDO₂ >561 mmHg at 72 h predicted the need for ECMO (sensitivity 64 %, specificity 95 %, positive predictive value 78 %).
conclusionsIn term newborns with PPHN partially responding to iNO and/or HFOV, oxygenation-based prediction of the need for ECMO appears to be possible after 72 h. ECMO centers are encouraged to develop their own prediction model in order to prevent both lung damage and unnecessary ECMO runs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.