ArticleImmunologic research2013
Evaluation of an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay kit for antinuclear antibodies in autoimmune diseases.
Article in Immunologic research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Frequency of extractable nuclear antigen seropositivity among individuals seronegative for antinuclear antibodies on indirect immunofluorescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Guideline
- Executive summary: British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Emerging technologies in autoantibody testing for rheumatic diseases.Arthritis research & therapy · 2017Review
- The burden of the variability introduced by the HEp-2 assay kit and the CAD system in ANA indirect immunofluorescence test.Immunologic research · 2017Article
- The Reliability of a Novel Automated System for ANA Immunofluorescence Analysis in Daily Clinical Practice.International journal of rheumatology · 2016Article
- The spectrum between antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus.Clinical rheumatology · 2014Article
- Current concepts and future directions for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as anti-nuclear antibodies.Journal of immunology research · 2014Review
- Evaluation of a multiplex ELISA for autoantibody profiling in patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases.Autoimmune diseases · 2014Article
- Unraveling the soul of autoimmune diseases: pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment adding dowels to the puzzle.Immunologic research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The identification of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) is an essential step in the diagnosis of different autoimmune diseases. The gold standard method for their detection is immunofluorescence assay. However, this is a subjective and laborious method, thus a need for simplified objective methods has aroused. In the current work, we evaluated such automated method, the LIAISON(®) (DiaSorin, Italy) for the detection of ANA. A total of 242 sera were analyzed including 67 from healthy subjects, 107 from primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) patients, 20 from scleroderma patients and 48 from patients with Sjögren's syndrome. All sera were analyzed using the automated chemiluminescent immunoassays, LIAISON(®) for the presence of ANA (kit No. 310300). Positive samples were further analyzed for the presence of antidouble-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and autoantibodies to 6 extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) of the LIAISON(®) (kits No. 310330 and 310331). Negative samples were further analyzed by Blueblot ANA assay (D-TEK, Belgium) or BlueDot Liver (D-TEK, Belgium) as appropriate. The LIAISON(®) specificity for ANA screening was 97%. ANA positivity was determined in 80% of all patients. The sensitivity was 95.5% in scleroderma, 83% in PBC and 72.9% in Sjogren's syndrome. ENA was positive in all ANA-positive scleroderma and Sjögren's sera and in 27% of ANA-positive PBC sera. Among scleroderma or Sjögren patients that were ANA negative, 4 samples were positive for anti-SSA and 2 for RNP-68 utilizing Blueblot assays. M2 protein was found in 1 out of the ANA-negative PBC patients. The LIAISON(®) ANA screen is specific and sensitive for the evaluation of ANA in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, scleroderma and Sjögren's syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.