ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2013
Discussing the psychiatric manifestations of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: an exploration of clinical practice among medical geneticists.
Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parents' perspectives, experiences, and need for support when communicating with their children about the psychiatric manifestations of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS).Journal of community genetics · 2022Article
- Understanding the pediatric psychiatric phenotype of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2018Review
- Communication of Psychiatric Risk in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: A Pilot Project.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Disclosure of psychiatric manifestations of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in medical genetics: A 12-year retrospective chart review.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2015Article
- Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC): examination of psychometric properties and responsiveness.BMC psychiatry · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to determine the frequency with which medical geneticists discuss the psychiatric manifestations of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) with families in relation to the frequency with which they discuss the other manifestations of the syndromes and to explore relationships between discussion of these features and stigma toward psychiatric disorders.
methodsWe surveyed medical geneticists in the United States and Canada regarding the frequency with which they discuss various features of 22q11DS with families in the context of four clinical scenarios in which only the age of the patient at diagnosis differed. Respondents also completed a 20-item validated psychometric measure of stigma toward psychiatric disorders.
results308 of 546 medical geneticists completed the survey (56% response rate). Overall, psychiatric disorders were discussed significantly less often than other features of 22q11DS (P < 0.0001) but were discussed significantly more often when the patient was 13 years or older (P < 0.0001) than when the patient was younger. Geneticists who discussed psychiatric disorders the least had significantly higher levels of stigma toward psychiatric disorders (P = 0.007).
conclusionPsychiatric manifestations of 22q11DS are less often discussed with families during childhood. Education for physicians to help reduce stigma toward psychiatric disorders (which may impede discussion of psychiatric disorders) may warrant exploration in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.