Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23578786›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology2013

Specific food structures supress appetite through reduced gastric emptying rate.

Alan R Mackie, Hameed Rafiee, Paul Malcolm, Louise Salt, George van Aken

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04812301 (Abbott Vital® as an Alternative Meal to the Gold-standard Egg-white Sandwich for Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04812301 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Abbott Vital® as an Alternative Meal to the Gold-standard Egg-white Sandwich for Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy (GES) Among Healthy Volunteers

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversiti Sains MalaysiaRan2021 to 2021Enrolled30ConditionsHealthyArmsEgg-white sandwich, Abbott Vital®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alan R MackieInstitute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK. alan.mackie@ifr.ac.uk
Hameed Rafiee
Paul Malcolm
Louise Salt
George van Aken
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GBNorwich Research Park · GBTiFN · NL

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which gastric layering and retention of a meal could be used to reduce appetite using the same caloric load. Liquid (control) and semi-solid (active) meals were produced with the same protein, fat, carbohydrate, and mass. These were fed to 10 volunteers on separate days in a crossover study, and subjective appetite ratings, gastric contents, and plasma cholecystokinin (CCK) were assessed over a period of 3 h. The active meal showed food boluses in the stomach persisting for ~45 min, slower emptying rates, and lower plasma CCK levels over the first hour. After the first hour, both gastric emptying rates and plasma CCK levels were similar for both systems and slightly increased compared with the unfed situation. Despite the lower plasma CCK levels for the active meal over the first hour, this meal reduced appetite more than the control meal over the 3 h of the study. For a moderately increased plasma CCK level in the fed state, appetite was correlated with the volume of gastric contents rather than gastric emptying rates or plasma CCK. This suggests that enhanced gastric retention was the key factor in decreasing appetite and was probably mediated by a combination of intestinal nutrient sensing and increased viscosity in the stomach.

Indexed as

FoodAdultAppetiteAppetite RegulationCase-Control StudiesCholecystokininGastric EmptyingHumansMaleMealsMiddle AgedStomachTime FactorsCholecystokininappetitecholecystokinindairy food structuregastric retention

Identifiers

PMID23578786
PMCPMC3680687
OpenAlexW2169905423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.