ArticleBMJ open2013
Patient-reported outcomes of cancer survivors in England 1-5 years after diagnosis: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMJ open, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04287218 (A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Therapist Guided Internet-delivered Cognitive Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Therapist Guided Internet-delivered Cognitive Therapy (TG-iConquerFear) With Augmented Treatment as Usual in Reducing Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Danish Colorectal Cancer Survivors
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transperineal biopsy devices in people with suspected prostate cancer - a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for colorectal and anal cancer: the extent of recommendations for managing long-term symptoms and functional impairments.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Pooled it
- Cancer survivorship monitoring systems for the collection of patient-reported outcomes: a systematic narrative review of international approaches.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Acceptability and Feasibility of an Isometric Resistance Exercise Program for Abdominal Cancer Surgery: An Embedded Qualitative Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterTrial
- Health-related Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Survivors Attending an Exercise Intervention Study: A Five-year Follow-up.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Trial
- Neurocognitive concerns and neurocognitive impairment in long-term survivors of oropharyngeal cancer post (chemo)radiotherapy.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Information-Seeking Patterns and Communication Preferences Among Japanese Survivors With Cancer: Cross-Sectional Analysis.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Incorporating patients' input in the development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures in oncology: a comprehensive scoping review.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Review
- Considering late effects costs in radiotherapy funding.The British journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Association of baseline and changes in health-related quality of life with mortality following myocardial infarction: multicentre longitudinal linked cohort study.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2025Article
- Article
- Survivor-driven development of a PROM for use in routine colorectal cancer care.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- Psychometric performance of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 in patients with lymphoma in China.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024Article
- Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients with Colorectal Cancer in Kazakhstan.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- Understanding the health-related quality of life and treatment-related side-effects in patients who have been in remission from testicular cancer for 12-24 months.Frontiers in urology · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Quality of life and mental health in breast cancer survivors compared with non-cancer controls: a study of patient-reported outcomes in the United Kingdom.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2021Article
- Health-related quality of life measured using EQ-5D in patients with lymphomas.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the feasibility of collecting population-based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in assessing quality of life (QoL) to inform the development of a national PROMs programme for cancer and to begin to describe outcomes in a UK cohort of survivors.
designCross-sectional postal survey of cancer survivors using a population-based sampling approach.
settingEnglish National Health Service.
participants4992 breast, colorectal, prostate and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) survivors 1-5 years from diagnosis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Implementation issues, response rates, cancer-specific morbidities utilising items including the EQ5D, tumour-specific subscales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy and Social Difficulties Inventory.
results3300 (66%) survivors returned completed questionnaires. The majority aged 85+ years did not respond and the response rates were lower for those from more deprived area. Response rates did not differ by gender, time since diagnosis or cancer type. The presence of one or more long-term conditions was associated with significantly lower QoL scores. Individuals from most deprived areas reported lower QoL scores and poorer outcomes on other measures, as did those self-reporting recurrent disease or uncertainty about disease status. QoL scores were comparable at all time points for all cancers except NHL. QoL scores were lower than those from the general population in Health Survey for England (2008) and General Practice Patient Survey (2012). 47% of patients reported fear of recurrence, while 20% reported moderate or severe difficulties with mobility or usual activities. Bowel and urinary problems were common among colorectal and prostate patients. Poor bowel and bladder control were significantly associated with lower QoL.
conclusionsThis method of assessing QoL of cancer survivors is feasible and acceptable to most survivors. Routine collection of national population-based PROMs will enable the identification of, and the support for, the specific needs of survivors while allowing for comparison of outcome by service provider.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.