Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23578570›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2013

A patient-derived somatic mutation in the epidermal growth factor receptor ligand-binding domain confers increased sensitivity to cetuximab in head and neck cancer.

El Mustapha Bahassi, Ya-Qin Li, Trisha M Wise-Draper, Li Deng, Jiang Wang, Colleen N Darnell, Keith M Wilson, Susanne I Wells, Peter J Stambrook, Olivier Rixe

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

El Mustapha BahassiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, UC Cancer Institute, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. bhassiem@uc.edu
Ya-Qin Li
Trisha M Wise-Draper
Li Deng
Jiang Wang
Colleen N Darnell
Keith M Wilson
Susanne I Wells
Peter J Stambrook
Olivier Rixe
University of Cincinnati · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MEINZEN-DERR, JAREEN, STRAWN, JEFFREY ROBERT · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCetuximab is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-blocking antibody that has been approved for the treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and metastatic colorectal cancer, but no predictive biomarkers of activity have been yet identified. Establishment of such biomarkers will help identify a subset of patients that will benefit from cetuximab therapy.

methodsIn this paper, we report on a patient with HNSCC who had a complete tumour regression following treatment with cetuximab given as a single agent after initial surgery and radiation therapy. The EGFR protein expression level, the EGFR gene copy number and the EGFR gene sequence were assessed from both normal and tumour tissues.

resultsBesides protein overexpression and gene amplification in the tumour tissue, sequencing of the EGFR gene from the patient revealed the presence of two somatic mutations, one in the kinase domain (R705G) and the other in the ligand binding domain (P546S). Cells that stably express these EGFR mutants were treated with cetuximab and their sensitivity to the drug was compared to cells expressing the wildtype gene. While P546S mutation sensitised NIH-3T3 cells to cetuximab, R705G had a marginal effect. The double mutant (P546S/R705G) behaved like the P546S mutant, indicating that the mutation in the kinase domain does not contribute to the increased sensitivity to cetuximab. No mutations were found in K-RAS or B-RAF genes and no HPV protein or DNA was detected in the tumour. This is the first report of a somatic mutation in the EGFR ligand binding domain that may contribute to increased sensitivity to cetuximab.

conclusionsOur results support a role for the P546S mutation in cetuximab sensitivity. Other factors including EGFR protein high copy number and protein overexpression may have also contributed to the observed response. The severity of a skin rash developed by this patient and its correlation with the antitumour activity does not exclude the involvement of the immune system (i.e. complement-mediated immune response) as well. The occurrence of the P546S mutation needs to be evaluated in HNSCC, as a well as a prospective evaluation of cetuximab anti-tumour activity in patients with tumours harbouring the mutation.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAnimalsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsBinding SitesCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell SurvivalCetuximabDNA Mutational AnalysisErbB ReceptorsExanthemaFatal OutcomeHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLigandsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximabErbB ReceptorsLigands

Identifiers

PMID23578570
PMCPMC5527707
OpenAlexW2045386602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.