Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23578541›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2013

Multiple large bowel resections: potential risk factor for anastomotic leak.

Eleftheria Kalogera, Sean C Dowdy, Andrea Mariani, Amy L Weaver, Giovanni Aletti, Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez, William A Cliby

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Comparison of Thermal Plasma Energy Versus Argon Beam Coagulator-Induced Intestinal Injury After Vaporization in a Porcine Model.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eleftheria KalogeraDivision of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sean C Dowdy
Andrea Mariani
Amy L Weaver
Giovanni Aletti
Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
William A Cliby
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Mayo Clinic Interdisciplinary Women's Health Research ProgramK12HD065987 · NICHD · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KANTARCI, KEJAL · 2010 to 2023
$6.7M
Targeting the Mullerian Inhibiting Substance pathway in gynecologic cancerR01CA148747 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CLIBY, WILLIAM A · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA148747NCI NIH HHS R01CA148747NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD065987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIdentify risk factors of anastomotic leak (AL) after large bowel resection (LBR) for ovarian cancer (OC) and compare outcomes between AL and no AL.

methodsAll cases of AL after LBR for OC between 01/01/1994 and 05/20/2011 were identified and matched 1:2 with controls for age (±5 years), sub-stage (IIIA/IIIB; IIIC; IV), and date of surgery (±4 years). Patient-specific and intraoperative risk factors, use of protective stomas, and outcomes were abstracted. A stratified conditional logistic regression model was fit to determine the association between each factor and AL.

results42 AL cases were evaluable and matched with 84 controls. Two-thirds of the AL had stage IIIC disease and >90% of both cases and controls were cytoreduced to <1cm residual disease. No patient-specific risk factors were associated with AL (pre-operative albumin was not available for most patients). Rectosigmoid resection coupled with additional LBR was associated with AL (OR=2.73, 95% CI 1.13-6.59, P=0.025), and protective stomas were associated with decreased risk of AL (0% vs. 10.7%, P=0.024). AL patients had longer length of stay (P<0.001), were less likely to start chemotherapy (P=0.020), and had longer time to chemotherapy (P=0.007). Cases tended to have higher 90-day mortality (P=0.061) and were more likely to have poorer overall survival (HR=2.05, 95% CI 1.18-3.57, P=0.011).

conclusionsMultiple LBRs appear to be associated with increased risk of AL and protective stomas with decreased risk. Since AL after OC cytoreduction significantly delays chemotherapy and negatively impacts survival, surgeons should strongly consider temporary diversion in selected patients (poor nutritional status, multiple LBRs, previous pelvic radiation, very low anterior resection, steroid use).

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakCase-Control StudiesFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansIntestine, LargeLength of StayMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsRisk FactorsSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID23578541
PMCPMC3686884
OpenAlexW2002262087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.