Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23577873›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2013

[More] evidence to support oral health promotion services targeted to smokers calling tobacco quitlines in the United States.

Jennifer B McClure, Karin Riggs, Jackie St John, Sheryl L Catz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer B McClureGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA. McClure.J@ghc.org
Karin Riggs
Jackie St John
Sheryl L Catz
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · US

Funding

Promoting Oral Health Among Tobacco Users: A Pilot Feasibility StudyR21DE019525 · NIDCR · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI MCCLURE, JENNIFER B · 2009 to 2010
$448k
Oral Health Planning GrantR34DE022784 · NIDCR · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI MCCLURE, JENNIFER B · 2012 to 2012
$247k
NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE019525NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE19525NIDCR NIH HHS R34 DE022784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior research demonstrated a need and opportunity to target smokers calling a free, state-funded tobacco quitline to provide behavioral counseling for oral health promotion; however, it is unclear whether these results generalize to tobacco quitline callers of higher socioeconomic status receiving services through commercially-funded quitlines. This knowledge will inform planning for a future public oral health promotion program targeted to tobacco quitline callers.

methodsWe surveyed smokers (n = 455) who had recently received tobacco quitline services through their medical insurance. Participants were asked about their self-reported oral health indicators, key behavioral risk factors for oral disease, motivation for changing their oral self-care behavior, and interest in future oral health promotion services. Where applicable, results were compared against those from a representative sample of callers to a free, state-funded quitline (n = 816) in the same geographic region.

resultsCallers to a commercially-funded quitline had higher socioeconomic status, were more likely to have dental insurance, and reported better overall oral health indicators and routine self-care (oral hygiene, dental visits) than callers to a state-funded quitline. Nevertheless opportunities for oral health promotion were identified. Nearly 80% of commercial quitline callers failed to meet basic daily hygiene recommendations, 32.8% had not visited the dentist in more than a year, and 63.3% reported daily alcohol consumption (which reacts synergistically with tobacco to increase oral cancer risk). Nearly half (44%) were interested in learning how to improve their oral health status and, on average, moderately high levels of motivation for oral health care were reported. Many participants also had dental insurance, eliminating an important barrier to professional dental care.

conclusionsFuture public oral health promotion efforts should focus on callers to both free state-supported and commercially-funded tobacco quitlines. While differences exist between these populations, both groups report behavioral risk factors for oral disease which represent important targets for intervention.

Indexed as

Oral HealthAdultEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHealth PromotionHotlinesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionSocioeconomic FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23577873
PMCPMC3635972
OpenAlexW2110926281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.