Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23577642›Full record

ArticleJournal of health communication2013

Validation of the diabetes numeracy test with adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Shelagh A Mulvaney, Jessica S Lilley, Kerri L Cavanaugh, Eric J Pittel, Russell L Rothman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health communication, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Self-care support of diet and the gut in the routine care of school-age children with long-term conditions: An integrative review.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Examining health literacy among urban African-American adolescents with asthma.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shelagh A MulvaneyVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. shelagh.mulvaney@vanderbilt.edu
Jessica S Lilley
Kerri L Cavanaugh
Eric J Pittel
Russell L Rothman
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Vanderbilt Diabetes Research CenterP30DK020593 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI OWEN P MCGUINNESS · 2012 to 2026
$29.3M
Vanderbilt Center for Diabetes Translation ResearchP30DK092986 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MILLER-HUGHES, STEPHANIA · 2011 to 2020
$6.7M
Addressing Literacy and Numeracy in Self-care & Clinical Outcomes in ESRDK23DK080952 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CAVANAUGH, KERRI · 2008 to 2012
$915k
Chronic Disease Management for Adolescents with Type 2 DiabetesK23DK065294 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ROTHMAN, RUSSELL L. · 2005 to 2009
$625k
Adolescent Self-Management of Diabetes: An InterventionR21DK070026 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MULVANEY, SHELAGH A · 2006 to 2007
$416k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK070026NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK065294NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK080952NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020593NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092986NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK070026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is currently a lack of valid instruments to measure adolescent diabetes numeracy. The Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT) was adapted for type 1 diabetes and was administered to 2 samples of adolescents. Sample 1 was administered the 39-item version of the DNT (DNT-39) with measures of self-management, responsibility, reading, and glycemic control (A1C). Sample 2 was administered the 14-item version of the DNT (DNT-14) with measures of self-management, responsibility, problem solving, and A1C. Both versions of the DNT showed adequate internal reliability. In Sample 1, the DNT-39 and DNT-14 were related (r = .87, p = .001), and both DNT versions were related to parent education (for DNT-14, r = .31, p = .02; for DNT-39, r = .29, p = .03) and reading (for DNT-14, r = .36, p = .005; for DNT-39, r = .40, p = .001). In Sample 2, the DNT-14 was related to A1C (r = -.29, p = .001), reading skills (r = .36, p = .005), diabetes problem solving (r = .27, p = .02), adolescent age (r = .19, p = .03), and parent education (r = .31, p = .02). In combined analyses, 75% of items were answered correctly on the DNT-14 (range = 7-100), and performance was associated with age (r = .19, p = .03), pump use (r = .33 p = .001), and A1C (r = -.29, p = .001). The DNT-14 is a feasible, reliable, and valid numeracy assessment that indicated adolescents with type 1 diabetes have numeracy deficits that may affect their glycemic control.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyMathematicsAdolescentDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Educational MeasurementFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSelf Care

Identifiers

PMID23577642
PMCPMC3817720
OpenAlexW2042191970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.