Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23577042›Full record

ArticleSoft matter2013

Microrheology of highly crosslinked microtubule networks is dominated by force-induced crosslinker unbinding.

Yali Yang, Mo Bai, William S Klug, Alex J Levine, Megan T Valentine

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Soft matter, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Passive and Active Microrheology for Biomedical Systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Computational modeling of single-cell mechanics and cytoskeletal mechanobiology.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2018
    Review
  16. Mechanical Properties of the Cytoskeleton and Cells.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Foam-like compression behavior of fibrin networks.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yali YangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. ; Tel: +805-893-2594;
Mo Bai
William S Klug
Alex J Levine
Megan T Valentine
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

OLYMPUS FLUOVIEW CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPES10RR017753 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI FISHER, STEVEN K · 2003 to 2003
$235k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR017753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We determine the time- and force-dependent viscoelastic responses of reconstituted networks of microtubules that have been strongly crosslinked by biotin-streptavidin bonds. To measure the microscale viscoelasticity of such networks, we use a magnetic tweezers device to apply localized forces. At short time scales, the networks respond nonlinearly to applied force, with stiffening at small forces, followed by a reduction in the stiffening response at high forces, which we attribute to the force-induced unbinding of crosslinks. At long time scales, force-induced bond unbinding leads to local network rearrangement and significant bead creep. Interestingly, the network retains its elastic modulus even under conditions of significant plastic flow, suggesting that crosslinker breakage is balanced by the formation of new bonds. To better understand this effect, we developed a finite element model of such a stiff filament network with labile crosslinkers obeying force-dependent Bell model unbinding dynamics. The coexistence of dissipation, due to bond breakage, and the elastic recovery of the network is possible because each filament has many crosslinkers. Recovery can occur as long as a sufficient number of the original crosslinkers are preserved under the loading period. When these remaining original crosslinkers are broken, plastic flow results.

Identifiers

PMID23577042
PMCPMC3618965
OpenAlexW2120578289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.