ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2013
Developing an understanding of cross-protection by Citrus tristeza virus.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineering the 3'-UTR of Tobacco Vein Mottling Virus to Confer Cross-Protection Against Potyviruses.Molecular plant pathology · 2026Article
- Mild Strain Cross-Protection in Passion Fruit.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Identification of the Matrix Protein as a Conserved and Central Determinant of Superinfection Exclusion in Plant Rhabdoviruses.Molecular plant pathology · 2025Article
- Progress in Our Understanding of the Cross-Protection Mechanism of CTV-VT No-SY Isolates Against Homologous SY Isolates.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- High-Throughput Sequencing Identified Multiple Fig Viruses and Viroids Associated with Fig Mosaic Disease in Iraq.The plant pathology journal · 2024Article
- Serological and Molecular Detection of Citrus Tristeza Virus: A Review.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Article
- Mechanisms of Microbial Plant Protection and Control of Plant Viruses.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Rootstocks with Different Tolerance Grade to Citrus Tristeza Virus Induce Dissimilar Volatile Profile inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Cooperative Virus-Virus Interactions: An Evolutionary Perspective.Biodesign research · 2022Review
- Genomic diversity of Areca Palm Velarivirus 1 (APV1) in Areca palm (Areca catechu) plantations in Hainan, China.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- High throughput sequencing from Angolan citrus accessions discloses the presence of emerging CTV strains.Virology journal · 2021Article
- Walking Together: Cross-Protection, Genome Conservation, and the Replication Machinery ofViruses · 2020Review
- Citrus tristeza virus: A large RNA virus with complex biology turned into a valuable tool for crop protection.PLoS pathogens · 2020Review
- Article
- A Spontaneous Complementary Mutation Restores the RNA Silencing Suppression Activity of HC-Pro and the Virulence of Sugarcane Mosaic Virus.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Detection of Plant Viruses and Disease Management: Relevance of Genetic Diversity and Evolution.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Citrus tristeza virus (CTV) causes two citrus diseases that have caused devastating losses in global citrus production. The first disease is quick decline of trees propagated on the sour orange rootstock. The second disease is stem pitting, which severely affects a number of economically important citrus varieties regardless of the rootstock used and results in reduced tree growth and vigor as well as in reduced fruit size and quality. Both diseases continue to invade new areas. While quick decline could be effectively managed by the use of resistant and/or tolerant rootstocks, the only means to protect commercial citrus against endemic stem pitting isolates of CTV has been cross-protection with mild isolates of the virus. In some citrus areas cross-protection has been successful and allowed production of certain citrus cultivars despite the presence of severe stem pitting isolates in those regions. However, many other attempts to find isolates that would provide sustained protection against aggressive isolates of the virus had failed. In general, there has been no understanding why some mild isolates were effective and others failed to protect. We have been working on the mechanism of cross-protection by CTV. Recent considerable progress has significantly advanced our understanding of how cross-protection may work in the citrus/CTV pathosystem. As we demonstrated, only isolates that belong to the same strain of the virus cross protect against each other, while isolates from different strains do not. We believe that the results of our research could now make finding protecting isolates relatively straightforward. This review discusses some of the history of CTV cross-protection along with the recent findings and our "recipe" for selection of protecting isolates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.