ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2013
Neural circuits for peristaltic wave propagation in crawling Drosophila larvae: analysis and modeling.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Multiple Scales of Coordination along the Body Axis duringThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Inhibitory circuits control leg movements duringeLife · 2026Article
- Octopamine receptors inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026Article
- Modeling based insights into mechanical dysfunction in esophageal motility disorders.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Finding a path: local search behavior of Drosophila larvae.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Article
- Inhibitory circuits control leg movements duringbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Behavioral resilience via dynamic circuit firing homeostasis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Opposing roles for GSK3β and ERK1-dependent phosphorylation of huntingtin during neuronal dysfunction and cell death in Huntington's disease.Cell death & disease · 2025Article
- Inhibitory circuit motifs in Drosophila larvae generate motor program diversity and variability.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Direct and Retrograde Wave Propagation in Unidirectionally Coupled Wilson-Cowan Oscillators.Physical review letters · 2025Article
- Characterizing stage-dependent neuromotor patterns inFrontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Kismet/CHD7/CHD8 and Amyloid Precursor Protein-like Regulate Synaptic Levels of Rab11 at theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- STEERING FROM THE REAR: COORDINATION OF CENTRAL PATTERN GENERATORS UNDERLYING NAVIGATION BY ASCENDING INTERNEURONS.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- The CHD Protein Kismet Restricts the Synaptic Localization of Cell Adhesion Molecules at theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The CHD family chromatin remodeling enzyme, Kismet, promotes both clathrin-mediated and activity-dependent bulk endocytosis.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- High-resolution analysis of individualOpen biology · 2023Article
- A protein restricted diet induces a stable increased fat storage phenotype in flies.Toxicology reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Drosophila larvae crawl by peristaltic waves of muscle contractions, which propagate along the animal body and involve the simultaneous contraction of the left and right side of each segment. Coordinated propagation of contraction does not require sensory input, suggesting that movement is generated by a central pattern generator (CPG). We characterized crawling behavior of newly hatched Drosophila larvae by quantifying timing and duration of segmental boundary contractions. We developed a CPG network model that recapitulates these patterns based on segmentally repeated units of excitatory and inhibitory (EI) neuronal populations coupled with immediate neighboring segments. A single network with symmetric coupling between neighboring segments succeeded in generating both forward and backward propagation of activity. The CPG network was robust to changes in amplitude and variability of connectivity strength. Introducing sensory feedback via "stretch-sensitive" neurons improved wave propagation properties such as speed of propagation and segmental contraction duration as observed experimentally. Sensory feedback also restored propagating activity patterns when an inappropriately tuned CPG network failed to generate waves. Finally, in a two-sided CPG model we demonstrated that two types of connectivity could synchronize the activity of two independent networks: connections from excitatory neurons on one side to excitatory contralateral neurons (E to E), and connections from inhibitory neurons on one side to excitatory contralateral neurons (I to E). To our knowledge, such I to E connectivity has not yet been found in any experimental system; however, it provides the most robust mechanism to synchronize activity between contralateral CPGs in our model. Our model provides a general framework for studying the conditions under which a single locally coupled network generates bilaterally synchronized and longitudinally propagating waves in either direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.