ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013
Gene similarity networks provide tools for understanding eukaryote origins and evolution.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unraveling GhMYB102: dual roles of Gh_A01G069800 in inhibiting anthocyanin biosynthesis and inducing drought tolerance in cotton.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Gene expression and co-expression heterogeneity patterns and biodemography analyses during the cell cycle encourage aging studies in archaea.GeroScience · 2026Article
- New groups of highly divergent proteins in families as old as cellular life with important biological functions in the ocean.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- Metatranscriptomes-based sequence similarity networks uncover genetic signatures within parasitic freshwater microbial eukaryotes.Microbiome · 2025Article
- On the origin of the nucleus: a hypothesis.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023Review
- Origins and Functional Significance of Eukaryotic Protein Folds.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Article
- Constructing gene similarity networks using co-occurrence probabilities.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Genome enrichment of rare and unknown species from complicated microbiomes by nanopore selective sequencing.Genome research · 2023Article
- Review
- Protein folds as synapomorphies of the tree of life.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022Article
- Unique mobile elements and scalable gene flow at the prokaryote-eukaryote boundary revealed by circularized Asgard archaea genomes.Nature microbiology · 2022Article
- WINNER: A network biology tool for biomolecular characterization and prioritization.Frontiers in big data · 2022Article
- Evolutionary Pathways and Trajectories in Antibiotic Resistance.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2021Article
- Bacterial Genes Outnumber Archaeal Genes in Eukaryotic Genomes.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Article
- Carbon Fixation by Marine Ultrasmall Prokaryotes.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Article
- Unity and disunity in evolutionary sciences: process-based analogies open common research avenues for biology and linguistics.Biology direct · 2016Review
- Article
- "Every Gene Is Everywhere but the Environment Selects": Global Geolocalization of Gene Sharing in Environmental Samples through Network Analysis.Genome biology and evolution · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complexity and depth of the relationships between the three domains of life challenge the reliability of phylogenetic methods, encouraging the use of alternative analytical tools. We reconstructed a gene similarity network comprising the proteomes of 14 eukaryotes, 104 prokaryotes, 2,389 viruses and 1,044 plasmids. This network contains multiple signatures of the chimerical origin of Eukaryotes as a fusion of an archaebacterium and a eubacterium that could not have been observed using phylogenetic trees. A number of connected components (gene sets with stronger similarities than expected by chance) contain pairs of eukaryotic sequences exhibiting no direct detectable similarity. Instead, many eukaryotic sequences were indirectly connected through a "eukaryote-archaebacterium-eubacterium-eukaryote" similarity path. Furthermore, eukaryotic genes highly connected to prokaryotic genes from one domain tend not to be connected to genes from the other prokaryotic domain. Genes of archaebacterial and eubacterial ancestry tend to perform different functions and to act at different subcellular compartments, but in such an intertwined way that suggests an early rather than late integration of both gene repertoires. The archaebacterial repertoire has a similar size in all eukaryotic genomes whereas the number of eubacterium-derived genes is much more variable, suggesting a higher plasticity of this gene repertoire. Consequently, highly reduced eukaryotic genomes contain more genes of archaebacterial than eubacterial affinity. Connected components with prokaryotic and eukaryotic genes tend to include viral and plasmid genes, compatible with a role of gene mobility in the origin of Eukaryotes. Our analyses highlight the power of network approaches to study deep evolutionary events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.