Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23576570›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2013

Statistical evaluation of the Rodin-Ohno hypothesis: sense/antisense coding of ancestral class I and II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.

Srinivas Niranj Chandrasekaran, Galip Gürkan Yardimci, Ozgün Erdogan, Jeffrey Roach, Charles W Carter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Ribosome Structure, Function, and Early Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A unified model of the standard genetic code.Royal Society open science · 2017
    Article
  19. Coding of Class I and II Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Srinivas Niranj ChandrasekaranDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina, USA.
Galip Gürkan Yardimci
Ozgün Erdogan
Jeffrey Roach
Charles W Carter

Funding

Sense/Antisense Genetic Coding and the Origins of TranslationR01GM078227 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CARTER, CHARLES W. · 2006 to 2018
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM78227NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested the idea that ancestral class I and II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases arose on opposite strands of the same gene. We assembled excerpted 94-residue Urgenes for class I tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase (TrpRS) and class II Histidyl-tRNA synthetase (HisRS) from a diverse group of species, by identifying and catenating three blocks coding for secondary structures that position the most highly conserved, active-site residues. The codon middle-base pairing frequency was 0.35 ± 0.0002 in all-by-all sense/antisense alignments for 211 TrpRS and 207 HisRS sequences, compared with frequencies between 0.22 ± 0.0009 and 0.27 ± 0.0005 for eight different representations of the null hypothesis. Clustering algorithms demonstrate further that profiles of middle-base pairing in the synthetase antisense alignments are correlated along the sequences from one species-pair to another, whereas this is not the case for similar operations on sets representing the null hypothesis. Most probable reconstructed sequences for ancestral nodes of maximum likelihood trees show that middle-base pairing frequency increases to approximately 0.42 ± 0.002 as bacterial trees approach their roots; ancestral nodes from trees including archaeal sequences show a less pronounced increase. Thus, contemporary and reconstructed sequences all validate important bioinformatic predictions based on descent from opposite strands of the same ancestral gene. They further provide novel evidence for the hypothesis that bacteria lie closer than archaea to the origin of translation. Moreover, the inverse polarity of genetic coding, together with a priori α-helix propensities suggest that in-frame coding on opposite strands leads to similar secondary structures with opposite polarity, as observed in TrpRS and HisRS crystal structures.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmino Acyl-tRNA SynthetasesBacteriaBase SequenceCatalytic DomainCodonHistidine-tRNA LigaseProtein Structure, SecondaryTryptophan-tRNA LigaseAmino Acyl-tRNA SynthetasesCodonHistidine-tRNA LigaseTryptophan-tRNA Ligaseaminoacyl-tRNA synthetasesancestral gene reconstructionmultiple sequence alignmentmultiple structure alignmentorigin of translationprotein modularitysense/antisense double open reading frames

Identifiers

PMID23576570
PMCPMC3684856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.