Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23576115›Full record

ArticleCancer2013

Cumulative family risk predicts sibling adjustment to childhood cancer.

Kristin A Long, Anna L Marsland, Melissa A Alderfer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From loss to meaning: therapeutic group processes in parental grief after pediatric cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Enhancing sibling support in oncology: Collaborative care for families facing cancer in young people.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2024
    Article
  4. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2024
    Article
  5. Educational pathways of childhood cancer survivors-a parental cohort.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Adolescent siblings of children with cancer: a qualitative study from a salutogenic health promotion perspective.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Grief and growth in bereaved siblings: Interactions between different sources of social support.School psychology quarterly : the official journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristin A LongDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. kristin_long@brown.edu
Anna L Marsland
Melissa A Alderfer

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN CHILD MENTAL HEALTHT32MH019927 · NIMH · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI) · PI Kristen G Benito, Anthony Spirito · 1994 to 2026
$7.8M
MEASURING SIBLING CANCER RELATED BELIEFS AND ADJUSTMENTSR03CA110926 · NCI · CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA · PI ALDERFER, MELISSA A. · 2004 to 2005
$166k
NCI NIH HHS CA110926NCI NIH HHS L30 CA103720NCI NIH HHS R03 CA110926NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProlonged, intensive treatment regimens often disrupt families of children with cancer. Siblings are at increased risk for distress, but factors underlying this risk have received limited empirical attention. In this study, the authors examined associations between the family context and sibling distress.

methodsSiblings of children with cancer (ages 8-18 years; N = 209) and parents (186 mothers and 70 fathers) completed measures of sibling distress, family functioning, parenting, and parent post-traumatic stress. Associations between sibling distress and each family risk factor were evaluated. Then, family risks were considered simultaneously by calculating cumulative family risk index scores.

resultsAfter controlling for sociodemographic covariates, greater sibling distress was associated with more sibling-reported problems with family functioning and parental psychological control, lower sibling-reported maternal acceptance, and lower paternal self-reported acceptance. When risk factors were considered together, the results supported a quadratic model in which associations between family risk and sibling distress were stronger at higher levels of risk.

conclusionsThe current findings support a contextual model of sibling adjustment to childhood cancer in which elevated distress is predicted by family risk factors, both alone and in combination.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalFamilyLife Change EventsNeoplasmsParent-Child RelationsParentingSocial AdjustmentAdolescentAdultChildConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID23576115
PMCPMC3686993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.