Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23575984›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2013

Flow process for electroextraction of total proteins from microalgae.

M Coustets, N Al-Karablieh, C Thomsen, J Teissié

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Aquaculture Production of the Brown SeaweedsMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Electroporation in food processing and biorefinery.The Journal of membrane biology · 2014
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M CoustetsCNRS, IPBS (Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale), UMR 5089, 205 Route de Narbonne BP 64182, Toulouse, 31077, France, coustets@ipbs.fr.
N Al-Karablieh
C Thomsen
J Teissié
Hydrosolutions (Switzerland) · CHInstitut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale · FRUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical methods for protein extraction from microorganisms, used for large-scale treatments such as mechanical or chemical processes, affect the integrity of extracted cytosolic protein by releasing proteases contained in vacuoles. Our previous experiments on flow-process yeast electroextraction proved that pulsed electric field technology allows us to preserve the integrity of released cytosolic proteins by keeping intact vacuole membranes. Furthermore, large volumes are easily treated by the flow technology. Based on this previous knowledge, we developed a new protocol in order to electroextract total cytoplasmic proteins from microalgae (Nannochloropsis salina and Chlorella vulgaris). Given that induction of electropermeabilization is under the control of the target cell size, as the mean diameter for N. salina is only 2.5 μm, we used repetitive 2-ms-long pulses of alternating polarities with stronger field strengths than previously described for yeasts. The electric treatment was followed by a 24-h incubation period in a salty buffer. The amount of total protein released was evaluated by a classical Bradford assay. A more accurate evaluation of protein release was obtained by SDS-PAGE. Similar results were obtained with C. vulgaris under milder electrical conditions, as expected from their larger size. This innovative technology designed in our group should become familiar in the field of microalgae biotechnology.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyElectroporationMicroalgaeProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID23575984
OpenAlexW2084942897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.