ArticleExperimental brain research2013
Neural mechanisms of shifts of spatial attention induced by object words with spatial associations: an ERP study.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural responses to rapidly selecting color names with different novelty.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2021Article
- Reading sky and seeing a cloud: On the relevance of events for perceptual simulation.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2017Article
- Age of Acquisition Effects on Word Processing for Chinese Native Learners' English: ERP Evidence for the Arbitrary Mapping Hypothesis.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors.PloS one · 2016Article
- Affective valence facilitates spatial detection on vertical axis: shorter time strengthens effect.Frontiers in psychology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study used event-related potentials (ERPs) to explore the nature of shifts of spatial attention induced by object words with spatial associations. Specifically, we presented participants with cue words that denote objects that typically appear in high or low places (e.g., "moon," "mouse") at the center of the screen. After the presentation of the cue words, participants were asked to identify a target letter ("p" or "q") at the top or bottom of the screen. Although the cues did not predict target locations (50 % valid) and were irrelevant to the task, the ERP analysis showed larger N1 amplitudes for congruent trials (i.e., the target letter's location was congruent with the typical location of the word's referent) and larger P3 amplitudes for incongruent trials. The present study extended previous studies by showing that the perception of object words could affect the processing of subsequent spatial stimuli at multiple stages (i.e., sensory processing and higher-level cognitive processing).
Indexed as
Identifiers
23575954What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.