Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23575828›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

Intensity invariant dynamics and odor-specific latencies in olfactory receptor neuron response.

Carlotta Martelli, John R Carlson, Thierry Emonet

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Convergent motifs of early olfactory processing are recapitulated by layer-wise efficient coding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Response Plasticity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Conserved neural dynamics and computations across species in olfaction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Carlotta MartelliDepartment of Molecular, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8103, USA.
John R Carlson
Thierry Emonet
Institut thématique Génétique, génomique et bioinformatique · FR

Funding

ANALYSIS OF ODORANT RECEPTOR GENESR01DC004729 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John R Carlson · 2001 to 2026
$9.2M
GENETIC AND MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF OLFACTIONR01DC002174 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CARLSON, JOHN R · 1994 to 2024
$8.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002174NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Odors elicit spatiotemporal patterns of activity in the brain. Spatial patterns arise from the specificity of the interaction between odorants and odorant receptors expressed in different olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs), but the origin of temporal patterns of activity and their role in odor coding remain unclear. We investigate how physiological aspects of ORN response and physical aspects of odor stimuli give rise to diverse responses in Drosophila ORNs. We show that odor stimuli have intrinsic dynamics that depend on odor type and strongly affect ORN response. Using linear-nonlinear modeling to remove the contribution of the stimulus dynamics from the ORN dynamics, we study the physiological properties of the response to different odorants and concentrations. For several odorants and receptor types, the ORN response dynamics normalized by the peak response are independent of stimulus intensity for a large portion of the dynamic range of the neuron. Adaptation to a background odor changes the gain and dynamic range of the response but does not affect normalized response dynamics. Stimulating ORNs with various odorants reveals significant odor-dependent delays in the ORN response functions. However, these differences can be dominated by differences in stimulus dynamics. In one case the response of one ORN to two odorants is predicted solely from measurements of the odor signals. Within a large portion of their dynamic range, ORNs can capture information about stimulus dynamics independently from intensity while introducing odor-dependent delays. How insects might use odor-specific stimulus dynamics and ORN dynamics in discrimination and navigation tasks remains an open question.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalOdorantsAction PotentialsAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsDrosophilaOlfactory Receptor NeuronsReaction TimeReceptors, OdorantReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID23575828
PMCPMC3678969
OpenAlexW2127793572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.