ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2013
Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 550 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reviewing the science on 50 years of conservation: Knowledge production biases and lessons for practice.Ambio · 2024Pooled it
- Contribution of systematic reviews to management decisions.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2013Pooled it
- Wildlife health in the One Health era: lessons from a 200-year institutional case study.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026Article
- Precision management of the pernicious weed Eriochloa villosa (Thunb.) Kunth in maize: an anchor-point calibration framework integrating economic thresholds and species distribution models.Pest management science · 2026Article
- Article
- Assessing Habitat Suitability and Landscape Connectivity for the Endangered Forest Musk Deer (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Evolution of research on global amphibian declines.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Review
- Challenging 10 misconceptions in conservation physiology.Conservation physiology · 2026Article
- Measuring environmental (in)justices: Insights from a systematic literature review on methodological approaches.iScience · 2025Article
- A social network analysis of the European science-policy-society interface on biodiversity.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Article
- Identifying Major Factors for Success and Failure of Conservation Programs in Europe.Environmental management · 2025Article
- The lab-field continuum in conservation physiology research: leveraging multiple approaches to inform policy and practice.Conservation physiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Conservation Mitonuclear Replacement: Facilitated mitochondrial adaptation for a changing world.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Perceived Challenges to Tribally Led Shellfish Toxin Testing in Southeast Alaska: Findings From Key Informant Interviews.GeoHealth · 2024Article
- Considerations for Research Funders and Managers to Facilitate the Translation of Scientific Knowledge into Practice.Environmental management · 2024Article
- Understanding the conservation-genetics gap in Latin America: challenges and opportunities to integrate genetics into conservation practices.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Assessing evidence on the impacts of nature-based interventions for climate change mitigation: a systematic map of primary and secondary research from subtropical and tropical terrestrial regions.Environmental evidence · 2023Article
- Closing the gap between science and management of cold-water refuges in rivers and streams.Global change biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are many barriers to using science to inform conservation policy and practice. Conservation scientists wishing to produce management-relevant science must balance this goal with the imperative of demonstrating novelty and rigor in their science. Decision makers seeking to make evidence-based decisions must balance a desire for knowledge with the need to act despite uncertainty. Generating science that will effectively inform management decisions requires that the production of information (the components of knowledge) be salient (relevant and timely), credible (authoritative, believable, and trusted), and legitimate (developed via a process that considers the values and perspectives of all relevant actors) in the eyes of both researchers and decision makers. We perceive 3 key challenges for those hoping to generate conservation science that achieves all 3 of these information characteristics. First, scientific and management audiences can have contrasting perceptions about the salience of research. Second, the pursuit of scientific credibility can come at the cost of salience and legitimacy in the eyes of decision makers, and, third, different actors can have conflicting views about what constitutes legitimate information. We highlight 4 institutional frameworks that can facilitate science that will inform management: boundary organizations (environmental organizations that span the boundary between science and management), research scientists embedded in resource management agencies, formal links between decision makers and scientists at research-focused institutions, and training programs for conservation professionals. Although these are not the only approaches to generating boundary-spanning science, nor are they mutually exclusive, they provide mechanisms for promoting communication, translation, and mediation across the knowledge-action boundary. We believe that despite the challenges, conservation science should strive to be a boundary science, which both advances scientific understanding and contributes to decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.