ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2013
Understanding the core result of the National Lung Screening Trial.
Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of lung cancer occurring in fibrotic versus non-fibrotic lung on chest CT.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Lung cancer: Low-dose CT screening - determining the right interval.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2016Article
- Advancing and sharing the knowledge base of CT screening for lung cancer.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Review
- The importance of the regimen of screening in maximizing the benefit and minimizing the harms.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Review
- Offering lung cancer screening to high-risk medicare beneficiaries saves lives and is cost-effective: an actuarial analysis.American health & drug benefits · 2014Article
- A cost-utility analysis of lung cancer screening and the additional benefits of incorporating smoking cessation interventions.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23574139What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.