Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23573779›Full record

ArticleExpert review of proteomics2013

Intact protein mass spectrometry and top-down proteomics.

Julian Whitelegge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of proteomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Julian WhiteleggeThe Pasarow Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, UCLA, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. jpw@chem.ucla.edu

Funding

Transgenic & Knock-out MouseP30DK063491 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PETER J TONTONOZ · 2003 to 2026
$40.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK063491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

American Society for Mass Spectrometry Sanibel meeting on top-down mass spectrometry St Pete Beach, FL, USA, 24-27 January 2013 Top-down mass spectrometry involves analysis of intact proteins, typically using electrospray ionization, as multiple charging enhances dissociation and thus identification by comparison of precursor and product ion masses with protein sequence databases. Traditionally a low-throughput, precision technology performed on high-resolution Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass analyzers, top-down proteomics aims to increase throughput for whole proteome analysis while preserving the inherent value of an intact protein mass measurement. This years' American Society for Mass Spectrometry Sanibel meeting brought together established scientists who have demonstrated the viability of the top-down approach and its applicability to virtually all segments of the proteome, mixing them with researchers from diverse areas and with the common interest of advancing top-down into the high-throughput proteomics mainstream. Advances in instrumentation including the orbitrap analyzer, ionization mechanisms, dissociation strategies and informatics, as well as a wide variety of applications, were discussed in depth, leading to the inescapable conclusion that the future for top-down is bright.

Indexed as

Congresses as TopicMass SpectrometryProteinsProteomicsUnited StatesProteins

Identifiers

PMID23573779
PMCPMC13482917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.