Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23573200›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Patients with severe radiographic osteoarthritis have a better prognosis in physical functioning after hip and knee replacement: a cohort-study.

J Christiaan Keurentjes, Marta Fiocco, Cynthia So-Osman, Ron Onstenk, Ankie W M M Koopman-Van Gemert, Ruud G Pöll, Herman M Kroon, Thea P M Vliet Vlieland, Rob G Nelissen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03339557 (Functional Outcome of Total Knee Replacement. Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial of Novel and Conventional Implants), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03339557 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Functional Outcome of Total Knee Replacement. Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial of Novel and Conventional Implants

TypeinterventionalSponsorCoxa, Hospital for Joint ReplacementRan2015 to 2021Enrolled240ConditionsOsteoarthritis, Knee, Arthroplasty, Total Knee ReplacementArmsNexGen, Persona, PFC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. The reason why orthopaedic surgeons perform total knee replacement: results of a randomised study using case vignettes.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty should be reserved for patients with complete joint space collapse.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

J Christiaan KeurentjesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marta Fiocco
Cynthia So-Osman
Ron Onstenk
Ankie W M M Koopman-Van Gemert
Ruud G Pöll
Herman M Kroon
Thea P M Vliet Vlieland
Rob G Nelissen
Leiden University Medical Center · NLAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NLGroene Hart Ziekenhuis · NLSanquin · NLSlotervaartziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough Total Hip and Knee Replacements (THR/TKR) improve Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) at the group level, up to 30% of patients are dissatisfied after surgery due to unfulfilled expectations. We aimed to assess whether the pre-operative radiographic severity of osteoarthritis (OA) is related to the improvement in HRQoL after THR or TKR, both at the population and individual level.

methodsIn this multi-center observational cohort study, HRQoL of OA patients requiring THR or TKR was measured 2 weeks before surgery and at 2-5 years follow-up, using the Short-Form 36 (SF36). Additionally, we measured patient satisfaction on a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRSS). The radiographic severity of OA was classified according to Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) by an independent experienced musculoskeletal radiologist, blinded for the outcome. We compared the mean improvement and probability of a relevant improvement (defined as a patients change score ≥ Minimal Clinically Important Difference) between patients with mild OA (KL Grade 0-2) and severe OA (KL Grade 3+4), whilst adjusting for confounders.

resultsSevere OA patients improved more and had a higher probability of a relevant improvement in physical functioning after both THR and TKR. For TKR patients with severe OA, larger improvements were found in General Health, Vitality and the Physical Component Summary Scale. The mean NRSS was also higher in severe OA TKR patients. DISCUSSION: Patients with severe OA have a better prognosis after THR and TKR than patients with mild OA. These findings might help to prevent dissatisfaction after THR and TKR by means of patient selection or expectation management.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, KneePatient SatisfactionPrognosisQuality of LifeRadiographyRecovery of FunctionSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID23573200
PMCPMC3616074
OpenAlexW2119743021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.