Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23573055›Full record

ArticlePhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology2012

Plant regeneration from mature embryo of commercial Indian bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars.

Sanjay Singh Parmar, Manish Sainger, Darshna Chaudhary, Pawan K Jaiwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. In vitro mature embryo culture protocol of einkorn (Plant cell, tissue and organ culture · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Role of activated charcoal and amino acids in developing an efficient regeneration system for foxtail millet (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2019
    Article
  6. Development of an efficient and reproducible regeneration system in wheat (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sanjay Singh ParmarCentre for Biotechnology, M. D. University, Rohtak, 124001 India.
Manish Sainger
Darshna Chaudhary
Pawan K Jaiwal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A simple, efficient, reproducible and comparatively genotype-independent in vitro plant regeneration protocol was developed for ten commercial Indian bread wheat cultivars using mature embryos as the explants. Three different auxins and five different combinations of growth regulators in a modified Murashige and Skoog's basal medium were assessed for their effect on callus induction and plant regeneration, respectively, in a high yielding and widely grown cultivar, PBW-343. The optimized conditions were further evaluated with nine other commercial cultivars. A simple novel approach of physical isolation of regenerable calli from non regenerable structures during the early callus phase was used to improve plant regeneration. Callus induced on 2.0 mg(-1) 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) showed a regeneration frequency of 86 % with 7.5 shoots per explants on hormone-free medium. A considerable improvement in the regeneration frequency (up to 97 %) and the average of shoots (19 shoots per explants) was obtained with a combination of thidiazuron (TDZ) and 2,4-D.

Indexed as

AuxinsCultivarsIn vitro plant regenerationMature embryoNon-regenerable structuresThidiazuron

Identifiers

PMID23573055
PMCPMC3550503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.