Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23572991›Full record

ArticlePhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology2011

Genetic transformation of eucalyptus.

V Girijashankar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Integrative Techniques for Hybrid Breeding inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Implementing the CRISPR/Cas9 Technology inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. In vitro regeneration of Eucalyptus camaldulensis.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

V GirijashankarCenter for Biotechnology, Institute for Science and Technology, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (JNTU), Kukatpally, Hyderabad, 500072 Andhra Pradesh India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eucalyptus is the second most widely planted multipurpose woody tree species in the world. It is a commercially important hardwood tree for paper and wood industries. In the past two decades, various research groups reported different genetic transformation protocols and attempts towards development of transgenic eucalyptus. Much of the work related to its genetic improvement through transgenic technology has been undertaken by private companies that keep the data confidential, patented and often share only a part of the scientific information as publications. The important areas which received scientific attention are wood quantity, quality, stress resistance and rootability. The present review deals with scientific advancements and insights made through the development of transgenic eucalyptus.

Indexed as

Genetic transformationTransgene escapeTransgenic eucalyptus

Identifiers

PMID23572991
PMCPMC3550564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.