Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23572416›Full record

ReviewFamilial cancer2013

The mechanism of mismatch repair and the functional analysis of mismatch repair defects in Lynch syndrome.

Juana V Martín-López, Richard Fishel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Familial cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. A Focused Clinical Review of Lynch Syndrome.Cancer management and research · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Diagnostics of Mutations in MMR/Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juana V Martín-LópezDepartment of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics, Human Cancer Genetics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Richard Fishel
Cancer Genetics (United States) · US

Funding

The Human Mismatch Repair Proteins and CarcinogenesisR01CA067007 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI Richard Fishel · 1995 to 2026
$9.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA67007NCI NIH HHS R01 CA067007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of Lynch syndrome (LS), also known as hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), has been linked to heterozygous defects in DNA mismatch repair (MMR). MMR is a highly conserved pathway that recognizes and repairs polymerase misincorporation errors and nucleotide damage as well as functioning as a damage sensor that signals apoptosis. Loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) that retains the mutant MMR allele and epigenetic silencing of MMR genes are associated with an increased mutation rate that drives carcinogenesis as well as microsatellite instability that is a hallmark of LS/HNPCC. Understanding the biophysical functions of the MMR components is crucial to elucidating the role of MMR in human tumorigenesis and determining the pathogenetic consequences of patients that present in the clinic with an uncharacterized variant of the MMR genes. We summarize the historical association between LS/HNPCC and MMR, discuss the mechanism of the MMR and finally examine the functional analysis of MMR defects found in LS/HNPCC patients and their relationship with the severity of the disease.

Indexed as

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA Mismatch RepairHumans

Identifiers

PMID23572416
PMCPMC4235668
OpenAlexW2045386082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.