Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23572411›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2013

Analysis of Latino populations from GALA and MEC studies reveals genomic loci with biased local ancestry estimation.

Bogdan Pasaniuc, Sriram Sankararaman, Dara G Torgerson, Christopher Gignoux, Noah Zaitlen, Celeste Eng, William Rodriguez-Cintron, Rocio Chapela, Jean G Ford, Pedro C Avila and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Bogdan PasaniucDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, CA 10833, USA. R01 HG006399
Sriram Sankararaman
Dara G Torgerson
Christopher Gignoux
Noah Zaitlen
Celeste Eng
William Rodriguez-Cintron
Rocio Chapela
Jean G Ford
Pedro C Avila
Jose Rodriguez-Santana
Gary K Chen
Loic Le Marchand
Brian Henderson
David Reich
Christopher A Haiman
Esteban Gonzàlez Burchard
Eran Halperin

Funding

Metrics and methods for cross-population fine mappingR03CA162200 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PASANIUC, BOGDAN · 2012 to 2013
$149k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA162200NCI NIH HHS R03CA162200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationLocal ancestry analysis of genotype data from recently admixed populations (e.g. Latinos, African Americans) provides key insights into population history and disease genetics. Although methods for local ancestry inference have been extensively validated in simulations (under many unrealistic assumptions), no empirical study of local ancestry accuracy in Latinos exists to date. Hence, interpreting findings that rely on local ancestry in Latinos is challenging.

resultsHere, we use 489 nuclear families from the mainland USA, Puerto Rico and Mexico in conjunction with 3204 unrelated Latinos from the Multiethnic Cohort study to provide the first empirical characterization of local ancestry inference accuracy in Latinos. Our approach for identifying errors does not rely on simulations but on the observation that local ancestry in families follows Mendelian inheritance. We measure the rate of local ancestry assignments that lead to Mendelian inconsistencies in local ancestry in trios (MILANC), which provides a lower bound on errors in the local ancestry estimates. We show that MILANC rates observed in simulations underestimate the rate observed in real data, and that MILANC varies substantially across the genome. Second, across a wide range of methods, we observe that loci with large deviations in local ancestry also show enrichment in MILANC rates. Therefore, local ancestry estimates at such loci should be interpreted with caution. Finally, we reconstruct ancestral haplotype panels to be used as reference panels in local ancestry inference and show that ancestry inference is significantly improved by incoroprating these reference panels. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: We provide the reconstructed reference panels together with the maps of MILANC rates as a public resource for researchers analyzing local ancestry in Latinos at http://bogdanlab.pathology.ucla.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

BiasCohort StudiesFamilyGenetic LociGenetics, PopulationGenome, HumanGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHaplotypesHispanic or LatinoHumansMexican AmericansPuerto RicoUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23572411
PMCPMC3661056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.