Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23572406›Full record

ArticleClinical nursing research2014

Evaluation of the SCKnowIQ tool and reproductive CHOICES intervention among young adults with sickle cell disease or sickle cell trait.

Agatha M Gallo, Diana J Wilkie, Edward Wang, Richard J Labotka, Robert E Molokie, Christiane Stahl, Patricia E Hershberger, Zhongsheng Zhao, Marie L Suarez, Bonnye Johnson and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical nursing research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Alpha Test of the Donor Conception Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Agatha M GalloUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, College of Nursing, Department of Women, Children and Family Health Science, Chicago, IL, USA Basic and Translational Research Program, Comprehensive Sickle Cell Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA agallo@uic.edu.
Diana J WilkieUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, College of Nursing, Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, Chicago, IL, USA Basic and Translational Research Program, Comprehensive Sickle Cell Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Edward WangUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, College of Applied Health Sciences,Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA.
Richard J LabotkaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago Department of Pediatrics, Chicago, IL, USA.
Robert E MolokieUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Chicago, IL, USA Jesse Brown Veteran's Administration Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA Basic and Translational Research Program, Comprehensive Sickle Cell Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Christiane StahlUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Patricia E HershbergerUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, College of Nursing, Department of Women, Children and Family Health Science, Chicago, IL, USA.
Zhongsheng ZhaoUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, College of Nursing, Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, Chicago, IL, USA.
Marie L SuarezUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, College of Nursing, Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, Chicago, IL, USA.
Bonnye JohnsonBasic and Translational Research Program, Comprehensive Sickle Cell Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Cherese PullumUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, College of Nursing, Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rigoberto AnguloUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, College of Nursing, Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alexis ThompsonNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation; Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Illinois Chicago · USJesse Brown VA Medical Center · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Tailored education for informed preproductive decisions in sickle cell diseaseU54HL090513 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI SAUNTHARARAJAH, YOGEN · 2008 to 2011
$4.5M
Sickle Cell Reproductive CHOICES: Efficacy of a Primary Prevention InterventionR01HL114404 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI GALLO, AGATHA M., WILKIE, DIANA J · 2012 to 2014
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114404NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL090513NHLBI NIH HHS U54HL090513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study purpose was to evaluate a computer-based questionnaire (SCKnowIQ) and CHOICES educational intervention using cognitive interviewing with childbearing-aged people with sickle cell disease (SCD) or trait (SCT). Ten control group participants completed the SCKnowIQ twice. Ten intervention group participants completed the SCKnowIQ before and after the CHOICES intervention. Most participants found the questionnaire items appropriate and responded to items as the investigators intended. Participants' responses indicated that the information on SCD and SCT and reproductive options was understandable, balanced, important, and new to some. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were adequate (.47 to .87) for 4 of the 6 scales, with significant within-group changes in knowledge scores for the intervention group but not for the control group. Findings show evidence for potential efficacy of the intervention, but proof of efficacy requires a larger randomized study.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorReproductionAdolescentAdultAnemia, Sickle CellFemaleHumansMaleSickle Cell TraitSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultcognitive interviewscomputer-based educationreproductivesickle cell disease (SCD)sickle cell trait (SCT)

Identifiers

PMID23572406
PMCPMC3740090
OpenAlexW2106098287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.