SynthesisLung2013
Guideline-concordant antimicrobial therapy for healthcare-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Lung, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short-course versus long-course therapy of the same antibiotic for community-acquired pneumonia in adolescent and adult outpatients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults (2018 Edition).Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Review
- Reply to Babbel et al., "Application of the DRIP Score at a Veterans Affairs Hospital".Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018Article
- Health care-associated pneumonia in the intensive care unit: Guideline-concordant antibiotics and outcomes.Journal of critical care · 2016Article
- Derivation and Multicenter Validation of the Drug Resistance in Pneumonia Clinical Prediction Score.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2016Article
- Association of guideline-based antimicrobial therapy and outcomes in healthcare-associated pneumonia.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of the 2005 American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America guideline-concordant antimicrobial therapy (GCAT) on mortality following healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP).
methodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus for clinical trials and observational studies comparing GCAT to other treatment regimens in adults with HCAP. The primary outcome chosen was 30-day mortality from any cause. Secondary outcomes assessed length of hospital stay and time to clinical stability. Random effects models were used to generate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and weighed mean differences (WMDs). Heterogeneity was evaluated by the I(2).
resultsA total of six studies were included in the analysis and involved 15,850 participants. Meta-analysis showed that GCAT was associated with increased 30-day mortality compared to non-GCAT (OR 1.80, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.26-2.7). There was no advantage in GCAT over non-GCAT in terms of hospital length of stay (WMD 1.18 days, 95 % CI -0.48 to 2.84) or time to clinical stability (WMD 0.17 days, 95 % CI -0.32 to 0.67).
conclusionIn hospitalized patients with HCAP, GCAT did not show survival benefit compared to non-GCAT. However, our results are limited by the cohort design of the selected studies and the degree of heterogeneity among them. Future trials are needed to identify risk factors for multidrug-resistant pathogens in HCAP patients who may benefit from broad-spectrum antimicrobial regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.