ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2013
Chronic myeloid leukemia: overview of new agents and comparative analysis.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term bosutinib for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of imatinib plus dasatinib and/or nilotinib.American journal of hematology · 2016Trial
- Long-term evaluation of cardiac and vascular toxicity in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias treated with bosutinib.American journal of hematology · 2016Trial
- Long-term efficacy and safety of bosutinib in patients with advanced leukemia following resistance/intolerance to imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors.American journal of hematology · 2015Trial
- CRISPR-Cas9 in basic and translational aspects of cancer therapy.BioImpacts : BI · 2024Review
- Investigating the potential therapeutic role of targeting STAT3 for overcoming drug resistance by regulating energy metabolism in chronic myeloid leukemia cells.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2022Article
- Restoration of miR-23a expression by chidamide sensitizes CML cells to imatinib treatment with concomitant downregulation of CRYAB.Bioengineered · 2022Article
- Bowel Perforation Secondary to Ponatinib Treatment in a Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Patient: A Case Report.Cureus · 2021Article
- The CoV-2 outbreak: how hematologists could help to fight Covid-19.Pharmacological research · 2020Article
- Bosutinib Therapy in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Practical Considerations for Management of Side Effects.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2016Review
- A molecular and biophysical comparison of macromolecular changes in imatinib-sensitive and imatinib-resistant K562 cells exposed to ponatinib.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016Article
- Chemopreventive Effects of Dietary Eicosapentaenoic Acid Supplementation in Experimental Myeloid Leukemia.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2015Article
- Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Resistant to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Treatment.Biomarker insights · 2015Review
- Practice gaps and barriers to optimal care of hematologic malignancies in the United States.The Journal of community and supportive oncology · 2014Article
- Is a cure for CML without allogeneic stem cell transplantation around the corner?Blood research · 2014Review
- Article
- Article
- Therapy of chronic myeloid leukemia: twilight of the imatinib era?ISRN oncology · 2014Review
- A novel quantitative kinase assay using bacterial surface display and flow cytometry.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Discovery of targeted BCR-ABL protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in the therapy of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is perhaps the most popular success story in oncology. Imatinib is the most common TKI modality used as a frontline therapy in CML across the world. Lately, randomized control trials have shown that second-generation TKI, such as dasatinib and nilotinib, are superior to imatinib in terms of tolerability and efficacy. Therefore, second-generation TKI have been used increasingly as a first choice for patients with CML in chronic phase (CML-CP). Recently, ponatinib has shown significant efficacy against the most resistant cases (including those with T315I mutations) with CML. Omacetaxine is a non-TKI agent with a different mechanism of action and has shown benefit in resistant CML. Analysis of other novel agents and newer mechanisms affecting CML stem cells are under exploration. With these developments, the life expectancy of the majority of patients (>90 %) with CML-CP has become comparable to a healthy age-matched individual. The focus has now shifted to achieving faster and deeper responses, considering these parameters as a surrogate for long-term outcome and possibly cures in patients with CML. Adherence to therapy with TKI, proper monitoring by standardized techniques, and adequate use of the available therapies are established rules of managing patients with CML. However, even with these advances, problems of drug resistance, loss of response, kinase domain mutations, transformations in CML (accelerated and blast phase), and patient noncompliance prevail in the community practice. Early identification of resistant cases, feasibility for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), and enrollment in clinical trials with newer drugs is warranted. This article compares the efficacy and safety results of various TKI and non-TKI modalities and other novel pharmacological agents in the therapy of CML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.