Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23572211›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2014

Adolescence: a time of transition for the phenotype of dcc heterozygous mice.

Leora Yetnikoff, Matthew Pokinko, Andreas Arvanitogiannis, Cecilia Flores

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Making Dopamine Connections in Adolescence.Trends in neurosciences · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Amphetamine in adolescence disrupts the development of medial prefrontal cortex dopamine connectivity in a DCC-dependent manner.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Leora YetnikoffDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Matthew Pokinko
Andreas Arvanitogiannis
Cecilia Flores
McGill University · CAConcordia University · CADouglas Mental Health University Institute · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleStark differences exist between adult (>PND 70) and juvenile (∼PND 21-34) rodents in how DCC (deleted in colorectal cancer) receptors and sensitization to amphetamine interact. In adults, repeated amphetamine upregulates DCC receptor expression selectively in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), an effect that is critical for sensitization. In contrast, amphetamine administered to juveniles downregulates VTA DCC expression. Moreover, whereas adult dcc heterozygous mice fail to sensitize when repeatedly treated with amphetamine, drug treatment during the juvenile period actually abolishes this adult "protective" phenotype.

objectivesWe set out to determine whether adolescence (PND ∼35-55) is a period during which: (1) amphetamine-induced alterations in VTA DCC expression switch from downregulation to upregulation; (2) the "protective" phenotype of adult dcc heterozygotes against sensitization becomes evident; and (3) the adult "protective" phenotype of dcc heterozygotes can still be abolished by repeated amphetamine treatment.

resultsRepeated amphetamine did not significantly alter VTA DCC expression in adolescent rodents when assessed 1 week later. Both wild-type and dcc heterozygous mice exhibited sensitization at this time. Remarkably, wild-type mice, but not dcc heterozygotes, exhibited sensitization when tested during adulthood.

conclusionsAdolescence is a time of transition for dcc heterozygotes as related to sensitization. Our results support the hypothesis that DCC may be a key factor in determining age-dependent individual differences in vulnerability to sensitization. Given that exposure to drugs of abuse during adolescence can have profound consequences for adulthood, the resilience of adult dcc heterozygous mice against adolescent exposure to amphetamine is particularly salient.

Indexed as

AmphetamineAnimalsCentral Nervous System StimulantsDCC ReceptorDown-RegulationGene ExpressionHeterozygoteMaleMice, TransgenicMotor ActivityPhenotypeRandom AllocationRats, TransgenicRats, WistarReceptors, Cell SurfaceTumor Suppressor ProteinsAmphetamineCentral Nervous System StimulantsDcc protein, mouseDcc protein, ratDCC ReceptorReceptors, Cell SurfaceTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23572211
OpenAlexW2130987050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.