Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23571872›Full record

SynthesisIntensive care medicine2013

Noninvasive ventilation in chest trauma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

D Chiumello, S Coppola, S Froio, C Gregoretti, D Consonni

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Intensive care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Brazilian recommendations of mechanical ventilation 2013. Part 2.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2014
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Noninvasive ventilation in chest trauma-related acute respiratory failure related to chest trauma: Efficacy and risk of pneumothorax.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Risk factors affecting severe thoracic injuries in motor vehicle collisions based on age group and collision directions.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Non-invasive ventilation in the ED: Whom, When, How?Turkish journal of emergency medicine · 2018
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Severe thoracic trauma - still an independent predictor for death in multiple injured patients?Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

D ChiumelloDipartimento di Anestesia, Rianimazione (Intensiva e Subintensiva) e Terapia del Dolore, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy. chiumello@libero.it
S Coppola
S Froio
C Gregoretti
D Consonni
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSingle studies of Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) in the management of acute respiratory failure in chest trauma patients have produced controversial findings. The aim of this study is to critically review the literature to investigate whether NIV reduces mortality, intubation rate, length of stay and complications in patients with chest trauma, compared to standard therapy.

methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies, by searching PubMed, EMBASE and bibliographies of articles retrieved. We screened for relevance studies that enrolled adults with chest trauma who developed mild to severe acute respiratory failure and were treated with NIV. We included studies reporting at least one clinical outcome of interest to perform a meta-analysis.

resultsTen studies (368 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were included for the meta-analysis. Five studies (219 patients) reported mortality and results were quite homogeneous across studies, with a summary relative risk for patients treated with NIV compared with standard care (oxygen therapy and invasive mechanical ventilation) of 0.26 (95 % confidence interval 0.09-0.71, p = 0.003). There was no advantage in mortality of continuous positive airway pressure over noninvasive pressure support ventilation. NIV significantly increased arterial oxygenation and was associated with a significant reduction in intubation rate, in the incidence of overall complications and infections.

conclusionsThese results suggest that NIV could be useful in the management of acute respiratory failure due to chest trauma.

Indexed as

Noninvasive VentilationAdultHospital MortalityHumansIntubation, IntratrachealLength of StayRespiratory InsufficiencyRiskThoracic InjuriesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23571872
OpenAlexW1980168727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.