ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
Eventual situations for timeline extraction from clinical reports.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accurate Clinical Entity Recognition and Code Mapping of Anatomopathological Reports Using BioClinicalBERT Enhanced by Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Hybrid Deep Learning Approach.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Hybrid natural language processing tool for semantic annotation of medical texts in Spanish.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Named Entity Recognition in Electronic Health Records: A Methodological Review.Healthcare informatics research · 2023Article
- Combining data augmentation and domain information with TENER model for Clinical Event Detection.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Complexities, variations, and errors of numbering within clinical notes: the potential impact on information extraction and cohort-identification.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
- Temporal data representation, normalization, extraction, and reasoning: A review from clinical domain.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2016Review
- Methodological Issues in Predicting Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery Candidates Through Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning.Biomedical informatics insights · 2016Article
- Automatic identification of methotrexate-induced liver toxicity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from the electronic medical record.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015Article
- Evaluating temporal relations in clinical text: 2012 i2b2 Challenge.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAReview
- Temporal reasoning over clinical text: the state of the art.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo identify the temporal relations between clinical events and temporal expressions in clinical reports, as defined in the i2b2/VA 2012 challenge.
designTo detect clinical events, we used rules and Conditional Random Fields. We built Random Forest models to identify event modality and polarity. To identify temporal expressions we built on the HeidelTime system. To detect temporal relations, we systematically studied their breakdown into distinct situations; we designed an oracle method to determine the most prominent situations and the most suitable associated classifiers, and combined their results.
resultsWe achieved F-measures of 0.8307 for event identification, based on rules, and 0.8385 for temporal expression identification. In the temporal relation task, we identified nine main situations in three groups, experimentally confirming shared intuitions: within-sentence relations, section-related time, and across-sentence relations. Logistic regression and Naïve Bayes performed best on the first and third groups, and decision trees on the second. We reached a 0.6231 global F-measure, improving by 7.5 points our official submission.
conclusionsCarefully hand-crafted rules obtained good results for the detection of events and temporal expressions, while a combination of classifiers improved temporal link prediction. The characterization of the oracle recall of situations allowed us to point at directions where further work would be most useful for temporal relation detection: within-sentence relations and linking History of Present Illness events to the admission date. We suggest that the systematic situation breakdown proposed in this paper could also help improve other systems addressing this task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.