Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23571026›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2013

Noncanonical roles of the immune system in eliciting oncogene addiction.

Stephanie C Casey, David I Bellovin, Dean W Felsher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie C CaseyDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
David I Bellovin
Dean W Felsher
Stanford University · US

Funding

MOLECULAR &CELLULAR IMMUNOBIOLOGYT32AI007290 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Sean Curtis Bendall, Olivia M Martinez · 1985 to 2026
$27.0M
TRIGGERING CELL DEATH IN B CELL LYMPHOMAP01CA034233 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NOLAN, GARRY P · 1985 to 2010
$19.5M
Small Animal ImagingP50CA114747 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RAO, JIANGHONG · 2005 to 2014
$18.2M
MODELING THE ROLE OF PROGRESSION IN FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMAU54CA149145 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PLEVRITIS, SYLVIA KATINA · 2010 to 2014
$12.1M
MYC's Role in the Initiation and Maintenance of CancerR01CA089305 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FELSHER, DEAN W · 2001 to 2011
$3.7M
Computational Modeling of Cancer BiologyU56CA112973 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PLEVRITIS, SYLVIA KATINA · 2004 to 2009
$2.9M
Mechanisms by which Oncogene Inactivation Elicits Tumor Cell DeathR01CA170378 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FELSHER, DEAN W · 2012 to 2015
$2.1M
Molecular and Cellular Basis of Oncogene AddictionR01CA105102 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FELSHER, DEAN W · 2004 to 2010
$2.0M
Firefly Shared Instrument GrantS10RR024659 · NCRR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FELSHER, DEAN W · 2008 to 2008
$433k
Nanoscale proteomic profiles of hypoxia pathways to develop biomarkers of renal cR21CA169964 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FELSHER, DEAN W, LEPPERT, JOHN THOMAS · 2012 to 2013
$330k
The Role of CD4+ T Cells in Oncogene AddictionF32CA177139 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CASEY, STEPHANIE CATHERINE · 2013 to 2014
$102k
NCI NIH HHS CA034233NCI NIH HHS CA 089305NCI NIH HHS CA 105102NCI NIH HHS CA 112973NCI NIH HHS CA 114747NCI NIH HHS CA 170378 PQ22NCI NIH HHS F32 CA177139NCI NIH HHS P01 CA034233NCI NIH HHS P50 CA114747NCI NIH HHS R01 CA089305NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105102NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170378NCI NIH HHS R21 CA169964NCI NIH HHS U54 CA149145NCI NIH HHS U56 CA112973NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR024659NIAID NIH HHS 5 T32 AI07290NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is highly complex. The magnitude of this complexity makes it highly surprising that even the brief suppression of an oncogene can sometimes result in rapid and sustained tumor regression, illustrating that cancers can be 'oncogene addicted' [1-10]. The essential implication is that oncogenes may not only fuel the initiation of tumorigenesis, but in some cases must be excessively activated to maintain a neoplastic state [11]. Oncogene suppression acutely restores normal physiological programs that effectively overrides secondary genetic events and a cancer collapses [12,13]. Oncogene addiction is the description of the dramatic and sustained regression of some cancers upon the specific inactivation of a single oncogene [1-13,14(••),15,16(••)], that can occur through tumor intrinsic [1,2,4,12], but also host immune mechanisms [17-23]. Notably, oncogene inactivation elicits a host immune response that involves specific immune effectors and cytokines that facilitate a remodeling of the tumor microenvironment including the shut down of angiogenesis and the induction of cellular senescence of tumor cells [16(••)]. Hence, immune effectors are not only critically involved in tumor prevention, initiation [17-19], and progression [20], but also appear to be essential to tumor regression upon oncogene inactivation [21,22(••),23(••)]. Understanding how the inactivation of an oncogene elicits a systemic signal in the host that prompts a deconstruction of a tumor could have important implications. The combination of oncogene-targeted therapy together with immunomodulatory therapy may be ideal for the development of both robust tumor intrinsic and immunological responses, effectively leading to sustained tumor regression.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsOncogenes

Identifiers

PMID23571026
PMCPMC3683588
OpenAlexW1980217641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.