ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2013
A semi-supervised approach to extract pharmacogenomics-specific drug-gene pairs from biomedical literature for personalized medicine.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational Advances in Drug Safety: Systematic and Mapping Review of Knowledge Engineering Based Approaches.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Pooled it
- Translating cancer genomics into precision medicine with artificial intelligence: applications, challenges and future perspectives.Human genetics · 2019Review
- Global Text Mining and Development of Pharmacogenomic Knowledge Resource for Precision Medicine.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Article
- Clinical Document Classification Using Labeled and Unlabeled Data Across Hospitals.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018Article
- Computational dynamic approaches for temporal omics data with applications to systems medicine.BioData mining · 2017Review
- Identifying Liver Cancer and Its Relations with Diseases, Drugs, and Genes: A Literature-Based Approach.PloS one · 2016Article
- Comparing a knowledge-driven approach to a supervised machine learning approach in large-scale extraction of drug-side effect relationships from free-text biomedical literature.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Automatic construction of a large-scale and accurate drug-side-effect association knowledge base from biomedical literature.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2014Article
- Chemical named entities recognition: a review on approaches and applications.Journal of cheminformatics · 2014Review
- Towards building a disease-phenotype knowledge base: extracting disease-manifestation relationship from literature.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Personalized medicine is to deliver the right drug to the right patient in the right dose. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is to identify genetic variants that may affect drug efficacy and toxicity. The availability of a comprehensive and accurate PGx-specific drug-gene relationship knowledge base is important for personalized medicine. However, building a large-scale PGx-specific drug-gene knowledge base is a difficult task. In this study, we developed a bootstrapping, semi-supervised learning approach to iteratively extract and rank drug-gene pairs according to their relevance to drug pharmacogenomics. Starting with a single PGx-specific seed pair and 20 million MEDLINE abstracts, the extraction algorithm achieved a precision of 0.219, recall of 0.368 and F1 of 0.274 after two iterations, a significant improvement over the results of using non-PGx-specific seeds (precision: 0.011, recall: 0.018, and F1: 0.014) or co-occurrence (precision: 0.015, recall: 1.000, and F1: 0.030). After the extraction step, the ranking algorithm further improved the precision from 0.219 to 0.561 for top ranked pairs. By comparing to a dictionary-based approach with PGx-specific gene lexicon as input, we showed that the bootstrapping approach has better performance in terms of both precision and F1 (precision: 0.251 vs. 0.152, recall: 0.396 vs. 0.856 and F1: 0.292 vs. 0.254). By integrative analysis using a large drug adverse event database, we have shown that the extracted drug-gene pairs strongly correlate with drug adverse events. In conclusion, we developed a novel semi-supervised bootstrapping approach for effective PGx-specific drug-gene pair extraction from large number of MEDLINE articles with minimal human input.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.