ArticleNeuroscience letters2013
Development of the N1-P2 auditory evoked response to amplitude rise time and rate of formant transition of speech sounds.
Article in Neuroscience letters, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Neurophysiology of spectrotemporal cue organization of spoken language in auditory memory.Brain and language · 2014Trial
- A two-system theory of sensory-evoked brain responses.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Neural mechanisms of articulatory motor speech deficit in post-stroke aphasia: An ERP study.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Acoustic and linguistic influences on rise-time modulations in natural English speech: evidence from a sensorimotor synchronization paradigm.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Electrical Brain Responses Reveal Sequential Constraints on Planning during Music Performance.Brain sciences · 2019Article
- Cross-modal phonetic encoding facilitates the McGurk illusion and phonemic restoration.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Article
- Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Electrophysiological evidence for differences between fusion and combination illusions in audiovisual speech perception.The European journal of neuroscience · 2017Article
- Weighting of Acoustic Cues to a Manner Distinction by Children With and Without Hearing Loss.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2015Article
- All cues are not created equal: the case for facilitating the acquisition of typical weighting strategies in children with hearing loss.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2015Article
- Individual sensitivity to spectral and temporal cues in listeners with hearing impairment.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2015Article
- Putative mechanisms mediating tolerance for audiovisual stimulus onset asynchrony.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
- Ideophones in Japanese modulate the P2 and late positive complex responses.Frontiers in psychology · 2015Article
- Acoustic Cue Weighting by Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Mismatch Negativity Study.Ear and hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated the development of weighting strategies for acoustic cues by examining the morphology of the N1-P2 auditory evoked potential (AEP) to changes in amplitude rise time (ART) and rate of formant transition (RFT) of consonant-vowel (CV) pairs in 4-6-year olds and adults. In the AEP session, individuals listened passively to the CVs /ba/, /wa/, and a /ba/ with a superimposed slower-rising /wa/ envelope (/ba/(wa)). In the behavioral session, individuals listened to the same stimuli and judged whether they heard a /ba/ or /wa/. We hypothesized that a developmental shift in weighting strategies should be reflected in a change in the morphology of the N1-P2 AEP. In 6-year olds and adults, the N1-P2 amplitude at the vertex reflected a change in RFT but not in ART. In contrast, in the 4-5-year olds, the vertex N1-P2 did not show specificity to changes in ART or RFT. In all groups, the N1-P2 amplitude at channel C4 (right hemisphere) reflected a change in ART but not in RFT. Behaviorally, 6-year olds and adults predominately utilized RFT cues (classified /ba/(wa) as /ba/) during phonetic judgments, as opposed to 4-5-year olds which utilized both cues equally. Our findings suggest that both ART and RFT are encoded in the auditory cortex, but an N1-P2 shift toward the vertex following age 4-5 indicates a shift toward an adult-like weighting strategy, such that, to utilize RFT to a greater extent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.