Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23570616›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2013

Santorinicele without pancreas divisum pathophysiology: initial clinical and radiographic investigations.

Wataru Gonoi, Hiroyuki Akai, Kazuchika Hagiwara, Masaaki Akahane, Naoto Hayashi, Eriko Maeda, Takeharu Yoshikawa, Shigeru Kiryu, Minoru Tada, Kansei Uno and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Pancreas and Known Factors of Acute Pancreatitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The clinical feature and outcome of groove pancreatitis in a cohort: A single center experience with review of the literature.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wataru Gonoi
Hiroyuki Akai
Kazuchika Hagiwara
Masaaki Akahane
Naoto Hayashi
Eriko Maeda
Takeharu Yoshikawa
Shigeru Kiryu
Minoru Tada
Kansei Uno
Naoki Okura
Kazuhiko Koike
Kuni Ohtomo
The University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JPJapan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnly one case of santorinicele without pancreas divisum pathophysiology (SWOPP) was previously reported. The purpose of the study was to determine the gross prevalence of SWOPP and santorinicele with pancreas divisum (SWPD) in community and patient populations, and investigate their clinical and radiographic features.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was performed at a tertiary referral centre. The Patient group comprised 2035 consecutive patients enrolled in the study who underwent magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) studies. The Community group comprised 2905 consecutive subjects who participated in our whole-body medical check-up program that routinely includes MRCP studies. SWOPP was diagnosed when a saccular dilatation of the terminal portion of the dorsal pancreatic duct was observed unaccompanied by pancreas divisum or dominant dorsal duct. The prevalence of SWOPP and SWPD, and the clinical and radiological features were assessed in each group.

resultsFive cases of SWOPP were found in the Patient group (age range, 67-85 years; mean age, 73.6 years) (5/2035 = 0.25%; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.57); there were no cases of SWOPP in the Community group (0/2905 = 0.00%; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.10) (P = 0.01). Previous history of pancreatitis (4/5) and chronic pancreatitis (3/5) was more common in patients with SWOPP than in other subjects in the Patient or Community groups (both P < 0.05). Two cases of SWOPP were accompanied by reverse-Z type meandering main pancreatic duct. Six cases of SWPD were found. These cases were asymptomatic in 4/6, had a larger santorinicele (6.9 mm) than SWOPP patients (4.5 mm; P = 0.02), and were not associated with pancreatitis (0/6).

conclusionsThe second to sixth reported cases of SWOPP were presented. SWOPP is a relatively rare condition found mostly in patients suffering pancreatitis, especially chronic pancreatitis, and may be an acquired condition. Santorinicele is not always accompanied by pancreas divisum.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildCholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceCross-Sectional StudiesDilatation, PathologicFemaleHumansIncidenceJapanMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic CystPancreatic Ducts

Identifiers

PMID23570616
PMCPMC3637151
OpenAlexW2062444553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.