Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23569956›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of tropical biomedicine2012

First survey of hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) on cattle, sheep and goats in Boeen Zahra and Takistan counties, Iran.

Masoomeh Shemshad, Khadijeh Shemshad, Mohammad Mehdi Sedaghat, Majid Shokri, Alireza Barmaki, Mojgan Baniardalani, Javad Rafinejad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of tropical biomedicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Survey of Potentially Pathogenic-Incriminated Arthropod Vectors of Health Concern in Botswana.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Survey on cattle ticks in Nur, north of Iran.Asian Pacific journal of tropical biomedicine · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Masoomeh ShemshadDepartment of Agricultural Extension and Education, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Khadijeh Shemshad
Mohammad Mehdi Sedaghat
Majid Shokri
Alireza Barmaki
Mojgan Baniardalani
Javad Rafinejad

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo carry out the distribution survey of hard ticks of livestock in Boeen Zahra and Takistan counties of Qazvin province from April 2010 to September 2010.

methodsNearly about 2 638 sheep, 461 goats and 318 cattle of 38 herds in different geographical areas were searched for tick infestation.

resultsThe species compositions collected from the livestock of Boeen Zahra and Takistan were Haemaphysalis concinna (0.63%), Haemaphysalis sulcata (12.66%), Hyalomma anatolicum (3.80%), Hyalomma asiaticum (3.16%), Hyalomma detritum (5.70%), Hyalomma dromedarii (28.48%), Hyalomma marginatum (13.29%), Hyalomma schulzei (1.89%), Rhipicephalus bursa (3.16%) and Rhipicephalus sanguineus (3.16%), and for Takistan's livestock were Hyalomma dromedarii (9.86%), Hyalomma marginatum (13.29%), Hyalomma schulzei (1.89%) and Rhipicephalus sanguineus (3.16%), respectively. Hard ticks compositions in different topographic areas were different. Hyalomma species had the most prevalence in the areas.

conclusionsThe veterinary and public health investigation of the above species should be taken.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesEctoparasitic InfestationsFemaleGoat DiseasesGoatsIranIxodidaeMalePrevalenceSheepSheep DiseasesBoeen ZahraCattleGoatsHard ticksIranIxodidaeSheepTakistan

Identifiers

PMID23569956
PMCPMC3609323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.