ArticleAsian Pacific journal of tropical biomedicine2012
Enhancement of wound healing with roots of Ficus racemosa L. in albino rats.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of tropical biomedicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Silico and In Vitro Analysis of Bioactive Compounds from Ficus benghalensis as a Novel Approach to Targeting Brain Abscess Pathogen.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2025Article
- African Medicinal Plants in Cutaneous Wound Repair: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Role of Phytochemicals.International wound journal · 2025Review
- Therapeutic applications of natural products in the management of venous diseases: a comprehensive review.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Review
- Article
- Phyto-pharmacological wonders of genusSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024Review
- Effects ofVeterinary medicine international · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Wound Healing Activity of 80% Methanol Stem-Bark Extract and Solvent Fractions ofJournal of experimental pharmacology · 2023Article
- Article
- Investigation of Wound Healing and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Solvent Fractions of 80% Methanol Leaf Extract ofJournal of inflammation research · 2021Article
- Molecular docking analysis of candidate compoundsderived from medicinal plants with type 2 diabetes mellitus targets.Bioinformation · 2019Article
- Dual function of active constituents from bark of Ficus racemosa L in wound healing.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2018Article
- Evaluation of the Wound Healing Activity of the Crude Extract of Leaves ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2018Article
- Evaluation of wound healing, antioxidant and antimicrobial efficacy of Jasminum auriculatum Vahl. leaves.Avicenna journal of phytomedicineArticle
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo establish the wound healing activity of aqueous and ethanolic extract of roots of Ficus racemosa (F. racemosa).
methodsTwo models were performed to evaluate the wound healing activity i.e. incision and excision models. In incision model the parameter which was carried out was breaking strength of wounded skin. In excision model percentage wound contraction and period of epithelialization were established for both the extracts. Reference standard drug was povidone iodine ointment for comparison with other groups.
resultsFrom the observation in both two models, aqueous extract of F. racemosa was found to have greater wound healing activity in terms of breaking strength in incision model and percentage wound contraction, period of epithelialization in excision model than that of other groups.
conclusionsIn conclusion, our findings suggest that aqueous extract of F. racemosa possesses better wound healing ability than the ethanolic extract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.