Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23569603›Full record

ArticleOnline journal of public health informatics2011

The electronic medical record and Patient-centered care.

Neil J Nusbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Online journal of public health informatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Neil J NusbaumDept of Veteran Affairs, VA Central Western Massachusetts Health care System.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne goal in EMR development should be to facilitate a patient-centered clinical encounter. Much prior EMR development has focused on capturing objective data, such as laboratory values and medication lists. Less attention has been devoted to the more complex task of capturing and analyzing data that incorporates the patient's concerns and preferences.

methodsA literature search supplemented the author's own various experiences with one EMR (that used nationally by the Department of Veterans Affairs) from his various perspectives of a physician, an educator, and a Chief of Staff. This data was used to identify both opportunities and obstacles to promoting patient-centered care in an integrated care setting that relies heavily on an EMR. Qualitative analysis and suggestions are offered for how the EMR can individualize patient care, in support of a patient-centered approach.

resultThree promising target areas in efforts to develop a patient-centered EMR are: elicitation of the chief complaint, conduct of health screening activities, and evaluation of health literacy. A range of strategies were identified, some of which may require information technology development, such as to facilitate patient direct entry of data into their own EMR.

conclusionEMR design can facilitate a more patient-centered clinical encounter. Beyond the benefits to the individual patient, patient-centric modifications to the EMR architecture may also facilitate quality improvement and research activities on patient centered care. In light of the widespread current discussions of a movement toward Accountable Care Organizations that use EMR, it will be especially important to ensure that the resulting care systems maintain a focus on the patient and not just on the system of care.

Indexed as

Health Promotion / Disease PreventionInformation TechnologyOrganization and Delivery of CareQuality of CareUsability of Health Information

Identifiers

PMID23569603
PMCPMC3615780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.