Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23569298›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2013

Developmental constraints on behavioural flexibility.

Kay E Holekamp, Eli M Swanson, Page E Van Meter

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sex Differences in Spotted Hyenas.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evolution of central pattern generators and rhythmic behaviours.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Taking note of Tinbergen, or: the promise of a biology of behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
  19. Constraints and flexibility in mammalian social behaviour: introduction and synthesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Article
  20. The influence of androgenic steroid hormones on female aggression in 'atypical' mammals.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kay E HolekampDepartment of Zoology, Michigan State University, 203 Natural Sciences, MI 48824, USA. holekamp@msu.edu
Eli M Swanson
Page E Van Meter
Michigan State University · US

Funding

Integrative Neurobiology of Social ProcessesT32MH070343 · NIMH · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BREEDLOVE, S MARC · 2004 to 2013
$1.1M
NIMH NIH HHS 2T32MH070343-06NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH070343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We suggest that variation in mammalian behavioural flexibility not accounted for by current socioecological models may be explained in part by developmental constraints. From our own work, we provide examples of constraints affecting variation in behavioural flexibility, not only among individuals, but also among species and higher taxonomic units. We first implicate organizational maternal effects of androgens in shaping individual differences in aggressive behaviour emitted by female spotted hyaenas throughout the lifespan. We then compare carnivores and primates with respect to their locomotor and craniofacial adaptations. We inquire whether antagonistic selection pressures on the skull might impose differential functional constraints on evolvability of skulls and brains in these two orders, thus ultimately affecting behavioural flexibility in each group. We suggest that, even when carnivores and primates would theoretically benefit from the same adaptations with respect to behavioural flexibility, carnivores may nevertheless exhibit less behavioural flexibility than primates because of constraints imposed by past adaptations in the morphology of the limbs and skull. Phylogenetic analysis consistent with this idea suggests greater evolutionary lability in relative brain size within families of primates than carnivores. Thus, consideration of developmental constraints may help elucidate variation in mammalian behavioural flexibility.

Indexed as

AggressionBehavior, AnimalAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBiological EvolutionBody WeightBrainHyaenidaeLocomotionOrgan SizePhylogenyPrimatesSelection, GeneticSkull

Identifiers

PMID23569298
PMCPMC3638453
OpenAlexW1984160180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.