Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23569234›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness.

Brian S Mautz, Bob B M Wong, Richard A Peters, Michael D Jennions

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Genital Dysmorphia-Psychopharmacology bulletin · 2025
    Article
  4. Human beauty illustrates the economic impact of heritable physical traits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. History and future perspectives of male aesthetic genital surgery.International journal of impotence research · 2022
    Review
  10. Seven computations of the social brain.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Hominid sexual nature.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Growers versus showers: a meaningful (or useful) distinction?International journal of impotence research · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brian S MautzResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. bmautz@uottawa.ca
Bob B M Wong
Richard A Peters
Michael D Jennions
Australian National University · AULa Trobe University · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compelling evidence from many animal taxa indicates that male genitalia are often under postcopulatory sexual selection for characteristics that increase a male's relative fertilization success. There could, however, also be direct precopulatory female mate choice based on male genital traits. Before clothing, the nonretractable human penis would have been conspicuous to potential mates. This observation has generated suggestions that human penis size partly evolved because of female choice. Here we show, based upon female assessment of digitally projected life-size, computer-generated images, that penis size interacts with body shape and height to determine male sexual attractiveness. Positive linear selection was detected for penis size, but the marginal increase in attractiveness eventually declined with greater penis size (i.e., quadratic selection). Penis size had a stronger effect on attractiveness in taller men than in shorter men. There was a similar increase in the positive effect of penis size on attractiveness with a more masculine body shape (i.e., greater shoulder-to-hip ratio). Surprisingly, larger penis size and greater height had almost equivalent positive effects on male attractiveness. Our results support the hypothesis that female mate choice could have driven the evolution of larger penises in humans. More broadly, our results show that precopulatory sexual selection can play a role in the evolution of genital traits.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSelection, GeneticBody SizeChoice BehaviorFemaleGenetic FitnessHumansMaleOrgan SizePenisSexual Behavior

Identifiers

PMID23569234
PMCPMC3637716
OpenAlexW2006449787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.