Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23569217›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2013

A TPR domain-containing N-terminal module of MPS1 is required for its kinetochore localization by Aurora B.

Wilco Nijenhuis, Eleonore von Castelmur, Dene Littler, Valeria De Marco, Eelco Tromer, Mathijs Vleugel, Maria H J van Osch, Berend Snel, Anastassis Perrakis, Geert J P L Kops

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Structure and function of the outer kinetochore.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Principles and dynamics of spindle assembly checkpoint signalling.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. [Progress in the Study of Spindle Assembly Checkpoint in Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Spindle assembly checkpoint activation and silencing at kinetochores.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  17. Mitotic checkpoint defects: en route to cancer and drug resistance.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Wilco NijenhuisDepartment of Molecular Cancer Research, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CG Utrecht, Netherlands.
Eleonore von Castelmur
Dene Littler
Valeria De Marco
Eelco Tromer
Mathijs Vleugel
Maria H J van Osch
Berend Snel
Anastassis Perrakis
Geert J P L Kops
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLCancer Genomics Centre · NLUtrecht University · NLMolecular Oncology (United States) · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mitotic checkpoint ensures correct chromosome segregation by delaying cell cycle progression until all kinetochores have attached to the mitotic spindle. In this paper, we show that the mitotic checkpoint kinase MPS1 contains an N-terminal localization module, organized in an N-terminal extension (NTE) and a tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain, for which we have determined the crystal structure. Although the module was necessary for kinetochore localization of MPS1 and essential for the mitotic checkpoint, the predominant kinetochore binding activity resided within the NTE. MPS1 localization further required HEC1 and Aurora B activity. We show that MPS1 localization to kinetochores depended on the calponin homology domain of HEC1 but not on Aurora B-dependent phosphorylation of the HEC1 tail. Rather, the TPR domain was the critical mediator of Aurora B control over MPS1 localization, as its deletion rendered MPS1 localization insensitive to Aurora B inhibition. These data are consistent with a model in which Aurora B activity relieves a TPR-dependent inhibitory constraint on MPS1 localization.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAurora Kinase BAurora KinasesCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Cycle ProteinsConserved SequenceCrystallography, X-RayCytoskeletal ProteinsEvolution, MolecularHeLa CellsHumansKinetochoresMicrotubulesMitosisMolecular Sequence DataNuclear ProteinsAURKB protein, humanAurora Kinase BAurora KinasesCell Cycle ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsNDC80 protein, humanNuclear ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtein-Tyrosine KinasesTTK protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23569217
PMCPMC3628519
OpenAlexW2036502020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.