Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23569106›Full record

ReviewCirculation research2013

Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: boutique science or valuable arrhythmia model?

Björn C Knollmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Recording ten-fold larger IFrontiers in physiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Comparison of the Simulated Response of ThreeFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Björn C KnollmannDepartment of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Nashville, TN 37232-0575, USA. bjorn.knollmann@vanderbilt.edu

Funding

Troponin T mutations and Sudden Cardiac DeathR01HL071670 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KNOLLMANN, BJORN C · 2003 to 2017
$4.5M
Calsequestrin in Ventricular Arrhythmia and Sudden DeathR01HL088635 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KNOLLMANN, BJORN C · 2007 to 2015
$3.2M
Flecainide for Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular TachycardiaR01HL108173 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI KANNANKERIL, PRINCE JOSEPH, KNOLLMANN, BJORN C · 2011 to 2014
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL088635NHLBI NIH HHS HL108173NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL071670NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL088635NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL108173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews the strengths and limitations of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CM) as models of cardiac arrhythmias. Specifically, the article attempts to answer the following questions: Which clinical arrhythmias can be modeled by iPSC-CM? How well can iPSC-CM model adult ventricular myocytes? What are the strengths and limitations of published iPSC-CM arrhythmia models? What new mechanistic insight has been gained? What is the evidence that would support using iPSC-CM to personalize antiarrhythmic drug therapy? The review also discusses the pros and cons of using the iPSC-CM technology for modeling specific genetic arrhythmia disorders, such as long QT syndrome, Brugada Syndrome, or Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMyocytes, Cardiac

Identifiers

PMID23569106
PMCPMC3667201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.