Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23568856›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2013

Nonclassical pharmacology of the dopamine transporter: atypical inhibitors, allosteric modulators, and partial substrates.

Kyle C Schmitt, Richard B Rothman, Maarten E A Reith

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Proteome-Informed Machine Learning Studies of Cocaine Addiction.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kyle C SchmittDepartment of Neurosurgery, New York University School of Medicine, 455 First Ave., Public Health Laboratories (8th Floor), New York, New York 10016, USA. kyle.schmitt@nyumc.org
Richard B Rothman
Maarten E A Reith
National Institute on Drug Abuse · USNational Institutes of Health · USNew York University · US

Funding

Dopamine Transporters: Mechanisms of Ligand InteractionR01DA019676 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI REITH, MAARTEN E · 2006 to 2016
$2.9M
Structural and Mechanistic Characterization of Neurotransmitter Reuptake InhibitiR01MH083840 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI WANG, DANENG · 2008 to 2012
$2.2M
Intramural NIH HHSNIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019676NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dopamine transporter (DAT) is a sodium-coupled symporter protein responsible for modulating the concentration of extraneuronal dopamine in the brain. The DAT is a principle target of various psychostimulant, nootropic, and antidepressant drugs, as well as certain drugs used recreationally, including the notoriously addictive stimulant cocaine. DAT ligands have traditionally been divided into two categories: cocaine-like inhibitors and amphetamine-like substrates. Whereas inhibitors block monoamine uptake by the DAT but are not translocated across the membrane, substrates are actively translocated and trigger DAT-mediated release of dopamine by reversal of the translocation cycle. Because both inhibitors and substrates increase extraneuronal dopamine levels, it is often assumed that all DAT ligands possess an addictive liability equivalent to that of cocaine. However, certain recently developed ligands, such as atypical benztropine-like DAT inhibitors with reduced or even a complete lack of cocaine-like rewarding effects, suggest that addictiveness is not a constant property of DAT-affecting compounds. These atypical ligands do not conform to the classic preconception that all DAT inhibitors (or substrates) are functionally and mechanistically alike. Instead, they suggest the possibility that the DAT exhibits some of the ligand-specific pleiotropic functional qualities inherent to G-protein-coupled receptors. That is, ligands with different chemical structures induce specific conformational changes in the transporter protein that can be differentially transduced by the cell, ultimately eliciting unique behavioral and psychological effects. The present overview discusses compounds with conformation-specific activity, useful not only as tools for studying the mechanics of dopamine transport, but also as leads for medication development in addictive disorders.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationAnimalsBiological TransportBrainDopamineDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsHumansLigandsMembrane Transport ModulatorsNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuronsProtein ConformationProtein IsoformsDopamineDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsLigandsMembrane Transport ModulatorsNerve Tissue ProteinsProtein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID23568856
PMCPMC3684841
OpenAlexW2115262105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.