Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23568186›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2013

Physical examination education in graduate medical education--a systematic review of the literature.

Somnath Mookherjee, Lara Pheatt, Sumant R Ranji, Calvin L Chou

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Quality in postgraduate medical education: A contested idea.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Teaching Evidence-Based Physical Diagnosis: A Workshop for Hospitalists.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2022
    Article
  9. Cardiac Physical Exam Skills and Auscultation Session for Pediatric Interns.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The first 200 years of cardiac auscultation and future perspectives.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Losing touch? Refining the role of physical examination in family medicine.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Somnath MookherjeeDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Magnuson Health Sciences Center, Room B-503, Box 356429, Seattle, WA 98195-6429, USA. smookh@u.washington.edu
Lara Pheatt
Sumant R Ranji
Calvin L Chou

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is widespread recognition that physical examination (PE) should be taught in Graduate Medical Education (GME), but little is known regarding how to best teach PE to residents. Deliberate practice fosters expertise in other fields, but its utility in teaching PE is unknown. We systematically reviewed the literature to determine the effectiveness of methods to teach PE in GME, with attention to usage of deliberate practice. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, ERIC, and EMBASE for English language studies regarding PE education in GME published between January 1951 and December 2012. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Seven eligibility criteria were applied to studies of PE education: (1) English language; (2) subjects in GME; (3) description of study population; (4) description of intervention; (5) assessment of efficacy; (6) inclusion of control group; and (7) report of data analysis. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

methodsWe extracted data regarding study quality, type of PE, study population, curricular features, use of deliberate practice, outcomes and assessment methods. Tabulated summaries of studies were reviewed for narrative synthesis.

resultsFourteen studies met inclusion criteria. The mean Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) score was 9.0 out of 18. Most studies (n = 8) included internal medicine residents. Half of the studies used resident interaction with a human examinee as the primary means of teaching PE. Three studies "definitely" and four studies "possibly" used deliberate practice; all but one of these studies demonstrated improved educational outcomes. LIMITATIONS: We used a non-validated deliberate practice assessment. Given the heterogeneity of assessment modalities, we did not perform a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY

findingsNo single strategy for teaching PE in GME is clearly superior to another. Following the principles of deliberate practice and interaction with human examinees may be beneficial in teaching PE; controlled studies including these educational features should be performed to investigate these exploratory findings.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetencePhysiciansEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansPhysical Examination

Identifiers

PMID23568186
PMCPMC3710393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.