SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2013
Physical examination education in graduate medical education--a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- How do novices learn physical examination skills? A systematic review of the literature.Medical education online · 2019Pooled it
- Quality in postgraduate medical education: A contested idea.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026Review
- Education Research: Comparison of Lecture-Based and Direct Instruction Didactics to Improve Neurologic Examination Confidence in Neurology Clerkship Students.Neurology. Education · 2025Article
- Cardiac auscultation skills among medical trainees.American heart journal · 2025Article
- A Novel Pediatric Clinical Skills Curriculum to Prepare Medical Students for Pediatrics Clerkship.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- The effects of mentorship and educational videos on nursing students' physical examination skills: a clinical audit.BMC nursing · 2023Article
- Review
- Teaching Evidence-Based Physical Diagnosis: A Workshop for Hospitalists.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2022Article
- Cardiac Physical Exam Skills and Auscultation Session for Pediatric Interns.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2022Article
- Article
- An exploratory analysis of factors contributing to resident pass rates on a national licensure OSCE in the United Arab Emirates.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Article
- The influence of gender on clinical examination skills of medical students in Jordan: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2020Article
- "Princess and the pea" - an assessment tool for palpation skills in postgraduate education.BMC medical education · 2019Article
- The first 200 years of cardiac auscultation and future perspectives.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2019Review
- Overcoming the barriers of teaching physical examination at the bedside: more than just curriculum design.BMC medical education · 2018Article
- The value of the physical examination in clinical practice: an international survey.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2017Article
- Losing touch? Refining the role of physical examination in family medicine.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2015Article
- Developing Physical Exam Skills in Residency: Comparing the Perspectives of Residents and Faculty About Values, Barriers, and Teaching Methods.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- Increasing Physical Exam Teaching on Family-Centered Rounds Utilizing a Web-Based Tool.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThere is widespread recognition that physical examination (PE) should be taught in Graduate Medical Education (GME), but little is known regarding how to best teach PE to residents. Deliberate practice fosters expertise in other fields, but its utility in teaching PE is unknown. We systematically reviewed the literature to determine the effectiveness of methods to teach PE in GME, with attention to usage of deliberate practice. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, ERIC, and EMBASE for English language studies regarding PE education in GME published between January 1951 and December 2012. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Seven eligibility criteria were applied to studies of PE education: (1) English language; (2) subjects in GME; (3) description of study population; (4) description of intervention; (5) assessment of efficacy; (6) inclusion of control group; and (7) report of data analysis. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS
methodsWe extracted data regarding study quality, type of PE, study population, curricular features, use of deliberate practice, outcomes and assessment methods. Tabulated summaries of studies were reviewed for narrative synthesis.
resultsFourteen studies met inclusion criteria. The mean Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) score was 9.0 out of 18. Most studies (n = 8) included internal medicine residents. Half of the studies used resident interaction with a human examinee as the primary means of teaching PE. Three studies "definitely" and four studies "possibly" used deliberate practice; all but one of these studies demonstrated improved educational outcomes. LIMITATIONS: We used a non-validated deliberate practice assessment. Given the heterogeneity of assessment modalities, we did not perform a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY
findingsNo single strategy for teaching PE in GME is clearly superior to another. Following the principles of deliberate practice and interaction with human examinees may be beneficial in teaching PE; controlled studies including these educational features should be performed to investigate these exploratory findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.